From: Francesco M. <f18...@ya...> - 2005-09-03 18:58:50
|
Hi, just an aesthetical doubt: should we use change the view options (look at the component list at the top) to use radio buttons instead of listboxes ? the viewmodes, browseby and # of comp contain only two choices... what's your advice ? Francesco Francesco Montorsi wrote: > I would like to start now with new component list; I tested the links > creator scripts and you can see the results at (for example): > > http://wxcode.sourceforge.net/complinks_category_partial.inc.html > > If you have any objection/comment/suggestion, please do it now, > FM > > > Francesco Montorsi wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Jorgen Bodde wrote: >> >>> This sounds very good! I like a categoric approach. As long as the >>> categories makes it easy to find controls. What do you mean with >>> managed controls? >> >> >> When I wrote the string >> >> Networking (12): 1 2 | Managed windows (2): 1 | Controls (30): 1 2 3 | >> ... >> >> I was just thinking to the categories I put in the database... I took >> them from the wxWidgets documentation page "classes by category": as >> you can see the first section is "managed windows", then "misc >> windows", etc. >> >>> Maybe it is an idea to get the following categories: >>> >>> - Edit controls (spin controls, text edit) >>> - Layout / Container controls (controls that can contain other controls) >>> - Non visual networking >>> - Non visial misc >> >> >> At first I took a similar approach creating some categories like these >> but then I thought: maybe using wxWidgets documentation categories is >> better since our components are based on wx and maybe that in future >> some of them will be integrated directly into wx itself. >> >> The current categories are: >> >> 'managed windows', 'miscellaneous windows', 'common dialogs', >> 'controls', 'window layout', 'networking', 'stream classes', 'database >> classes', 'miscellaneous', 'utilities', 'tutorials/wxdocs' >> >> Unfortunately I see that I completely forgot to update the "category" >> listbox in the EDIT page of the website :( >> >> Before repairing that I'd like to decide definitevely the main >> categories that the DB must support (in future others categories can >> be added to the DB without problems). >> >> So, do you think it's best to stick to wx categories I listed above >> (maybe adding some new entry) or we should use another different set >> of categories ? >> >>> Thanks for your effort in the site! >>> - Jorgen >> >> >> Thanks to all people submitting their code to wxCode ! ;) >> >> Francesco >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------- >> SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO >> September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle >> Practices >> Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing >> & QA >> Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf >> _______________________________________________ >> wxCode-users mailing list >> wxC...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wxcode-users >> > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO > September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices > Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA > Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf > _______________________________________________ > wxCode-users mailing list > wxC...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wxcode-users > |