From: Francesco M. <f18...@ya...> - 2005-09-01 07:46:35
|
Hi, Jorgen Bodde wrote: > This sounds very good! I like a categoric approach. As long as the > categories makes it easy to find controls. What do you mean with managed > controls? When I wrote the string Networking (12): 1 2 | Managed windows (2): 1 | Controls (30): 1 2 3 | ... I was just thinking to the categories I put in the database... I took them from the wxWidgets documentation page "classes by category": as you can see the first section is "managed windows", then "misc windows", etc. > Maybe it is an idea to get the following categories: > > - Edit controls (spin controls, text edit) > - Layout / Container controls (controls that can contain other controls) > - Non visual networking > - Non visial misc At first I took a similar approach creating some categories like these but then I thought: maybe using wxWidgets documentation categories is better since our components are based on wx and maybe that in future some of them will be integrated directly into wx itself. The current categories are: 'managed windows', 'miscellaneous windows', 'common dialogs', 'controls', 'window layout', 'networking', 'stream classes', 'database classes', 'miscellaneous', 'utilities', 'tutorials/wxdocs' Unfortunately I see that I completely forgot to update the "category" listbox in the EDIT page of the website :( Before repairing that I'd like to decide definitevely the main categories that the DB must support (in future others categories can be added to the DB without problems). So, do you think it's best to stick to wx categories I listed above (maybe adding some new entry) or we should use another different set of categories ? > Thanks for your effort in the site! > - Jorgen Thanks to all people submitting their code to wxCode ! ;) Francesco |