Re: [wxCode-users] Monthly status report

[Francesco M. <f18...@ya...>]

Hi,

> I think Ryan's idea is best, they can dual licence it if they like,
> but one of them has to the wxWindows license. As he pointed out, I
> completely missed the ramifications of the BSD license clause and I'm
> sure it can get much uglier than that. I've seen quite a few licenses
> with catches like, "for commercial use you must merely contact me...".
> What if you're not around anymore? The more I think about it, we
> should be fairly strict about licensing since it'll only cause
> problems later.
> 
> How about the wording below, I think we need a compelling explanation
> why we want the wxWindows license and a note about 3rd party libs
> since it's bound to come up as a question eventually.
> 
> "Each component must be made available under the wxWindows license.
> This is to ensure that there will be no misunderstandings by users of
> your code or clashes between components that may rely on each other.
> Remember; this code repository is designed to facilitate code reuse.
> Small third party libraries that you may include or link with your
> component will (of course) maintain their original license and you
> should note that in your documentation."
ok, that's still okay for me...

Francesco