From: Mike W. <mik...@nt...> - 2004-06-24 11:14:30
|
On Wednesday 23 June 2004 7:22 pm, Ryan Norton wrote: > So, I think unless somebody comes up with > a better name (I've been trying to come up > with one for a while) wxArchive is probably > best. Right, thanks, you've obviously given it some thought too. I think I'll stick with 'archive' then please Otto (I think I might as well have it without the 'wx' prefix, though that's not just a big thing). On Wednesday 23 June 2004 5:52 pm, Otto Wyss wrote: > IMO "archive" could mean anything from DBaccess to a collection of > items, I'd prefer if you could choose a more specific name instead. > If you insist on "archive" just say so. I think you're right, people looking down the list won't know what it is. They might think it's an old version of wxCode that's been archived off, or something like that. But I'll stick with it anyway, maybe later on I could put individual archive formats into their own directories, e.g. have a 'tar' project. But for now it'll be easier to me to have just one place to work on everything. Thanks, Mike |