|
From: Nycran <ny...@ya...> - 2004-10-20 00:48:30
|
Thanks guys. So you think just write the application in C using the native WX library? I'll have to polish up on my C skills that's for sure :-). --- Fabian Cenedese <Cen...@in...> wrote: > > >Well, wx4j does not concentrate on deployment and > installation. It is a widget set only. In fact, > wx4j may complicate deployment and installation > because of the extra native libraries needed. Also, > you noted that you wanted OS X support. wxWindows > and wx4j do not work well at all on OS X. I'd > suggest sticking with Swing. > > You're right if you speak about the official wx > release 2.4.2. But the actual > development version (2.5.3 or cvs) has quite good > support for Mac. Well, > that's what I have from the mailing list, I'm not a > Mac user. > > I'd say give wx alone a try and only if you find > something that doesn't > work you can do it in Java (or the other way round). > But if you don't have > a special reason to do so don't mix them. That's not > against the wx4j > team. I just think that it shouldn't get more > complicated than needed :) > > bye Fabi > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide > on ITManagersJournal > Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you > think of them. Give us > Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! > Click to find out more > http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl > _______________________________________________ > wx4j-users mailing list > wx4...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wx4j-users > ===== _______________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Declare Yourself - Register online to vote today! http://vote.yahoo.com |