|
From: Fabian C. <Cen...@in...> - 2004-10-19 13:55:01
|
>Well, wx4j does not concentrate on deployment and installation. It is a widget set only. In fact, wx4j may complicate deployment and installation because of the extra native libraries needed. Also, you noted that you wanted OS X support. wxWindows and wx4j do not work well at all on OS X. I'd suggest sticking with Swing. You're right if you speak about the official wx release 2.4.2. But the actual development version (2.5.3 or cvs) has quite good support for Mac. Well, that's what I have from the mailing list, I'm not a Mac user. I'd say give wx alone a try and only if you find something that doesn't work you can do it in Java (or the other way round). But if you don't have a special reason to do so don't mix them. That's not against the wx4j team. I just think that it shouldn't get more complicated than needed :) bye Fabi |