From: Dom L. <ci...@ho...> - 2001-07-11 14:26:34
|
>0x01 graphics, whatever they are, are not supported by wv-0.6.5. Though >I've been told they can be made to work. Generally they are <= Word95 graphics. As I've given up on the current wv codebase, any fixes will have to either wait for the new wv to work or have to come from another source (i.e. not me). Sorry, Dom _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com |
From: Dom L. <ci...@ho...> - 2001-07-11 14:26:39
|
>0x01 graphics, whatever they are, are not supported by wv-0.6.5. Though >I've been told they can be made to work. Generally they are <= Word95 graphics. As I've given up on the current wv codebase, any fixes will have to either wait for the new wv to work or have to come from another source (i.e. not me). Sorry, Dom _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com |
From: F J F. <F.J...@sh...> - 2001-07-11 14:42:09
|
On Wed, 11 Jul 2001, Dom Lachowicz wrote: > >0x01 graphics, whatever they are, are not supported by wv-0.6.5. Though > >I've been told they can be made to work. > > Generally they are <= Word95 graphics. As I've given up on the current wv > codebase, any fixes will have to either wait for the new wv to work or have > to come from another source (i.e. not me). Nah, didn't mean you... A week or so ago, Anil Madhavapeddy wrote: > In wvWare.c, line 904, there is a block of code that handles the WMF > (0x01 ?) conversion which is commented out at the moment. I uncommented > it, and embedded pictures are output in PNG format with no problem. I may have a look at it some time, but I find wv quite scary... Regards, Frank Francis James Franklin F.J...@sh... Their consultation consisted chiefly in propounding and supporting, for the thousandth time, each his favourite theories. --- George MacDonald |
From: Thomas J. <ja...@we...> - 2001-07-12 07:45:42
|
On Wed, Jul 11, 2001 at 03:41:52PM +0100, F J Franklin wrote: > On Wed, 11 Jul 2001, Dom Lachowicz wrote: > > Generally they are <= Word95 graphics. As I've given up on the current wv word95 graphics?!? i am wondering , because i have created a new word2000 document with imported jpgs,pngs.... > A week or so ago, Anil Madhavapeddy wrote: > > In wvWare.c, line 904, there is a block of code that handles the WMF > > (0x01 ?) conversion which is commented out at the moment. I uncommented > > it, and embedded pictures are output in PNG format with no problem. i uncommented this block and the conversion of pictures will work (still ratio problems of converted pics and an crash after 60% of the document) greetings tom |