Menu
▾
▴
wsmostudio-discuss — WSMO Studio discussion list
You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2005 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(1) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(12) |
Oct
(25) |
Nov
(3) |
Dec
(10) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 |
Jan
(15) |
Feb
(2) |
Mar
(7) |
Apr
(4) |
May
(6) |
Jun
(2) |
Jul
(2) |
Aug
(2) |
Sep
(4) |
Oct
(16) |
Nov
(2) |
Dec
(1) |
| 2007 |
Jan
(8) |
Feb
(8) |
Mar
(5) |
Apr
(5) |
May
(8) |
Jun
(12) |
Jul
(34) |
Aug
(3) |
Sep
(11) |
Oct
(6) |
Nov
(4) |
Dec
(3) |
| 2008 |
Jan
(27) |
Feb
|
Mar
(1) |
Apr
(7) |
May
(2) |
Jun
(5) |
Jul
(2) |
Aug
(3) |
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(1) |
Nov
(1) |
Dec
(2) |
| 2009 |
Jan
(2) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2010 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(1) |
May
(2) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
|
From: Marin D. <mar...@on...> - 2008-04-23 15:55:33
|
t....@gm... wrote: > Hello, > > is it possible to export an interface (with choreography, transition > rules etc.) to WSML-XML? In the exported file I only got a "<interface/>". > > I'm using WSMO Studio 0.7.3. > hi, at present this is not possible, since the wsmo4j parser is based on an old WSML-XML specification [1] that does not define a choreography/orchestration serialisation I'm not sure the WSML-XML part of the wsmo4j parser will be updated any time soon, since this format is not used that much [1] http://www.wsmo.org/TR/d16/d16.1/v0.21/#sec:wsml-xml best, Marin ---- "...what you brought from your past, is of no use in your present. When you must choose a new path, do not bring old experiences with you. Those who strike out afresh, but who attempt to retain a little of the old life, end up torn apart by their own memories. " |
|
From: <t....@gm...> - 2008-04-23 15:09:06
|
Hello, is it possible to export an interface (with choreography, transition rules etc.) to WSML-XML? In the exported file I only got a "<interface/>". I'm using WSMO Studio 0.7.3. Thanks a lot! Best regards, Torsten |
|
From: Alex S. <ale...@on...> - 2008-03-07 17:19:08
|
Hi all, A new version of WSMO Studio has just been released. This new release contains ontology modelling support improvements and a major rework of the Business Process Modelling environment (BPMO plug-in). For more details consult the changes section at: http://www.wsmostudio.org/changes-report.html#0_7_3 Resources: - WSMO Studio full distributions (zip archives and jar installers): http://www.wsmostudio.org/download.html (Note: it will take some time for synchronization of the US mirrors) - Individual plug-ins: http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=119791 - Eclipse update site: http://www.wsmostudio.org/updates/ Best regards, Alex |
|
From: Wei X. <wx...@in...> - 2008-01-31 14:53:40
|
Hi, Alex, =20 =20 Many thanks! It works now. The problem comes I did not give the value of the new property.=20 =20 =20 Since I am a new comer to WSMO ontology, and in general one may just define the property (with domain and range). I have a question for it: why must one need to assign a value to the added NFP? Thanks. =20 =20 =20 Regards, =20 =20 =20 Wei =20 =20 =20 From: Alex Simov [mailto:ale...@on...]=20 Sent: 31 January 2008 14:23 To: Wei Xing Cc: wsm...@li... Subject: Re: [wsmo-studio-discuss] Enquiry on NFP? =20 Hi Wei, =20 =20 1) context menu on the table editor table > Add Property 2) select property identifier (in your case 'security') with either a proper namespace or with full IRI specification (http://my-custom-domain.org#security) 3) the new property appears in the bottom of the table and you can specify values by context menu actions (leaving property values not specified will remove the property after closing the dialog). =20 =20 Best, Alex =20 ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Wei Xing <mailto:wx...@in...> =20 To: wsm...@li...=20 Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2008 4:13 PM Subject: Re: [wsmo-studio-discuss] Enquiry on NFP? =20 Hi, Alex, =20 =20 Thanks for the reply and links. =20 =20 I did this following the instructions. However, seems all NFP are pre-defined in the system. Namely, I can not add "security" as a new NFP in my ontology definition? Any idea about it ? Thanks. =20 =20 =20 Regards, =20 =20 =20 Wei =20 =20 =20 From: Alex Simov [mailto:ale...@on...]=20 Sent: 31 January 2008 12:20 To: Wei Xing Cc: wsm...@li... Subject: Re: [wsmo-studio-discuss] Enquiry on NFP? =20 Hi, =20 have a look at the WSMO Studio Users Guide [1], page 35, fugire 5.7 ("Add Property"). =20 HTH, Alex =20 [1] http://www.wsmostudio.org/doc/wsmo-studio-ug.pdf =20 =20 =20 =20 ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Wei Xing <mailto:wx...@in...> =20 To: wsm...@li...=20 Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2008 2:13 PM Subject: [wsmo-studio-discuss] Enquiry on NFP? =20 Hi,=20 =20 =20 How to add an non-function property (e.g, security) using WSMO studio? Thanks. =20 =20 =20 Regards, =20 =20 =20 Wei =20 =20 =09 =09 __________ NOD32 2838 (20080131) Information __________ =09 This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system. http://www.eset.com =09 ________________________________ =09 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ =09 __________ NOD32 2838 (20080131) Information __________ =09 This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system. http://www.eset.com =09 ________________________________ _______________________________________________ =09 WSMO Studio * http://www.wsmostudio.org/ Users Guide * http://www.wsmostudio.org/doc/wsmo-studio-ug.pdf =09 wsmostudio-discuss mailing list * wsm...@li... List info * https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsmostudio-discuss =09 =09 __________ NOD32 2838 (20080131) Information __________ =09 This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system. http://www.eset.com =09 =09 __________ NOD32 2838 (20080131) Information __________ =09 This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system. http://www.eset.com =09 ________________________________ =09 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ =09 __________ NOD32 2838 (20080131) Information __________ =09 This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system. http://www.eset.com =09 ________________________________ _______________________________________________ =09 WSMO Studio * http://www.wsmostudio.org/ Users Guide * http://www.wsmostudio.org/doc/wsmo-studio-ug.pdf =09 wsmostudio-discuss mailing list * wsm...@li... List info * https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsmostudio-discuss =09 =09 __________ NOD32 2838 (20080131) Information __________ =09 This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system. http://www.eset.com |
|
From: Alex S. <ale...@on...> - 2008-01-31 14:22:54
|
Hi Wei, 1) context menu on the table editor table > Add Property 2) select property identifier (in your case 'security') with either a = proper namespace or with full IRI specification = (http://my-custom-domain.org#security) 3) the new property appears in the bottom of the table and you can = specify values by context menu actions (leaving property values not = specified will remove the property after closing the dialog). Best, Alex ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Wei Xing=20 To: wsm...@li...=20 Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2008 4:13 PM Subject: Re: [wsmo-studio-discuss] Enquiry on NFP? Hi, Alex, =20 =20 Thanks for the reply and links. =20 =20 I did this following the instructions. However, seems all NFP are = pre-defined in the system. Namely, I can not add "security" as a new NFP = in my ontology definition? Any idea about it ? Thanks. =20 =20 =20 Regards, =20 =20 =20 Wei =20 =20 =20 From: Alex Simov [mailto:ale...@on...]=20 Sent: 31 January 2008 12:20 To: Wei Xing Cc: wsm...@li... Subject: Re: [wsmo-studio-discuss] Enquiry on NFP? =20 Hi, =20 have a look at the WSMO Studio Users Guide [1], page 35, fugire 5.7 = ("Add Property"). =20 HTH, Alex =20 [1] http://www.wsmostudio.org/doc/wsmo-studio-ug.pdf =20 =20 =20 =20 ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Wei Xing=20 To: wsm...@li...=20 Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2008 2:13 PM Subject: [wsmo-studio-discuss] Enquiry on NFP? =20 Hi,=20 =20 =20 How to add an non-function property (e.g, security) using WSMO = studio? Thanks. =20 =20 =20 Regards, =20 =20 =20 Wei =20 =20 __________ NOD32 2838 (20080131) Information __________ This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system. http://www.eset.com -------------------------------------------------------------------------= --- = -------------------------------------------------------------------------= This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ __________ NOD32 2838 (20080131) Information __________ This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system. http://www.eset.com -------------------------------------------------------------------------= --- _______________________________________________ WSMO Studio * http://www.wsmostudio.org/ Users Guide * http://www.wsmostudio.org/doc/wsmo-studio-ug.pdf wsmostudio-discuss mailing list * = wsm...@li... List info * = https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsmostudio-discuss __________ NOD32 2838 (20080131) Information __________ This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system. http://www.eset.com __________ NOD32 2838 (20080131) Information __________ This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system. http://www.eset.com -------------------------------------------------------------------------= ----- = -------------------------------------------------------------------------= This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ __________ NOD32 2838 (20080131) Information __________ This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system. http://www.eset.com -------------------------------------------------------------------------= ----- _______________________________________________ WSMO Studio * http://www.wsmostudio.org/ Users Guide * http://www.wsmostudio.org/doc/wsmo-studio-ug.pdf wsmostudio-discuss mailing list * = wsm...@li... List info * = https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsmostudio-discuss __________ NOD32 2838 (20080131) Information __________ This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system. http://www.eset.com |
|
From: Wei X. <wx...@in...> - 2008-01-31 14:13:39
|
Hi, Alex,
=20
=20
Thanks for the reply and links.
=20
=20
I did this following the instructions. However, seems all NFP are
pre-defined in the system. Namely, I can not add "security" as a new NFP
in my ontology definition? Any idea about it ? Thanks.
=20
=20
=20
Regards,
=20
=20
=20
Wei
=20
=20
=20
From: Alex Simov [mailto:ale...@on...]=20
Sent: 31 January 2008 12:20
To: Wei Xing
Cc: wsm...@li...
Subject: Re: [wsmo-studio-discuss] Enquiry on NFP?
=20
Hi,
=20
have a look at the WSMO Studio Users Guide [1], page 35, fugire 5.7
("Add Property").
=20
HTH,
Alex
=20
[1] http://www.wsmostudio.org/doc/wsmo-studio-ug.pdf
=20
=20
=20
=20
----- Original Message -----=20
From: Wei Xing <mailto:wx...@in...> =20
To: wsm...@li...=20
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2008 2:13 PM
Subject: [wsmo-studio-discuss] Enquiry on NFP?
=20
Hi,=20
=20
=20
How to add an non-function property (e.g, security) using WSMO
studio? Thanks.
=20
=20
=20
Regards,
=20
=20
=20
Wei
=20
=20
=09
=09
__________ NOD32 2838 (20080131) Information __________
=09
This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
http://www.eset.com
=09
________________________________
=09
------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
=09
__________ NOD32 2838 (20080131) Information __________
=09
This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
http://www.eset.com
=09
________________________________
_______________________________________________
=09
WSMO Studio * http://www.wsmostudio.org/
Users Guide * http://www.wsmostudio.org/doc/wsmo-studio-ug.pdf
=09
wsmostudio-discuss mailing list *
wsm...@li...
List info *
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsmostudio-discuss
=09
=09
__________ NOD32 2838 (20080131) Information __________
=09
This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
http://www.eset.com
|
|
From: Alex S. <ale...@on...> - 2008-01-31 12:19:53
|
Hi,
have a look at the WSMO Studio Users Guide [1], page 35, fugire 5.7 =
("Add Property").
HTH,
Alex
[1] http://www.wsmostudio.org/doc/wsmo-studio-ug.pdf
----- Original Message -----=20
From: Wei Xing=20
To: wsm...@li...=20
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2008 2:13 PM
Subject: [wsmo-studio-discuss] Enquiry on NFP?
Hi,=20
=20
=20
How to add an non-function property (e.g, security) using WSMO studio? =
Thanks.
=20
=20
=20
Regards,
=20
=20
=20
Wei
=20
=20
__________ NOD32 2838 (20080131) Information __________
This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
http://www.eset.com
-------------------------------------------------------------------------=
-----
=
-------------------------------------------------------------------------=
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
__________ NOD32 2838 (20080131) Information __________
This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
http://www.eset.com
-------------------------------------------------------------------------=
-----
_______________________________________________
WSMO Studio * http://www.wsmostudio.org/
Users Guide * http://www.wsmostudio.org/doc/wsmo-studio-ug.pdf
wsmostudio-discuss mailing list * =
wsm...@li...
List info * =
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsmostudio-discuss
__________ NOD32 2838 (20080131) Information __________
This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
http://www.eset.com
|
|
From: Wei X. <wx...@in...> - 2008-01-31 12:14:22
|
Hi,=20 =20 =20 How to add an non-function property (e.g, security) using WSMO studio? Thanks. =20 =20 =20 Regards, =20 =20 =20 Wei =20 =20 |
|
From: Alex S. <ale...@on...> - 2008-01-24 15:39:34
|
Federico, the tool tries to be clever enough to detect sequence blockpatterns (on user demand) from the uniform contolflow representation. All other modelling elements are explicitly represented and it's up to the user to decide which modeling style to use for serialisation. Alex ----- Original Message ----- From: "Federico Michele Facca" <fa...@el...> To: "'Alex Simov'" <ale...@on...>; "'Adrian Mocan'" <adr...@de...> Cc: <wsm...@li...> Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2008 4:32 PM Subject: R: BPMO Editor Bug Hi Alex, nice feature. But you should not be permitted to mixup the two representations. On on hand the tool should be clever enough to serialize to blockPattern if not gateway/merge but only blockpattern are used. On the other hand, the tool should serilize to graphPattern if gateway/merge and not blockPattern are used. If both occurs, the tool should say "incorrect modeling". Best, Federico > -----Messaggio originale----- > Da: Alex Simov [mailto:ale...@on...] > Inviato: giovedì 24 gennaio 2008 13.12 > A: Adrian Mocan; Federico Michele Facca > Cc: wsm...@li... > Oggetto: Re: BPMO Editor Bug > > Hi Federico, Adrian, > > actually it's a feature;-) > > By default, the BPMO modeller tries to detect automatically > sequences as block patterns (in this version of the plug-in, > the sequences are not explicitly represented on the visual diagram). > > However this behavior is optional and it can be disabled by > unselecting: > Window > Preferences ... > WSMO Studio > BPMO Modeller > > Enable Sequences generation on Save. > > Thus the diagram will be represented by graphpattern connectors only. > > Currently, we are developing separate representations for > sequences as blockpatterns and as graphpattern and this > option will be removed. > > And one more issue, I'd recommend reporting bugs in the > issues tracking system of SourceForge [1] which would > facilitate the report processing from our side. > > Best, > Alex > > [1] > http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=119791&atid=684995 > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Federico Michele Facca" <fa...@el...> > To: <ale...@on...> > Cc: "'Marin Dimitrov'" <mar...@on...> > Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2008 12:09 PM > Subject: BPMO Editor Bug > > > > Hi Alex, > > I'm working with Adrian Mocan on the BPMO editor to > generate mediators. > > We noticed a bug (relevant in my opinion) in the tool: > > if you model a process using what you assume to be GraphPatterns, > > the serialized model will use in some point graph patterns and > > blockpatterns in others. This should not be possible! > > Look at the example attached. > > > > Best, > > Federico > > > > ---------------------------------------------- > > Federico Michele Facca > > Dipartimento di Elettronica e Informazione > > Politecnico di Milano > > Via Ponzio 34/5, > > 20133 Milano, Italy > > phone: +39 02 2399 3667 > > fax: +39 02 2399 3411 > > mobile: +39 328 408 7745 > > web: http://dblambs.elet.polimi.it/people/federico > > > > No virus found in this outgoing message. > > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > > Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.19.10/1240 - Release Date: > > 23/01/2008 > > 17.47 > > > > > > > > > > __________ NOD32 2818 (20080123) Information __________ > > > > This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system. > > http://www.eset.com > > > > > > > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.19.10/1240 - Release > Date: 23/01/2008 17.47 > > No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.19.10/1240 - Release Date: 23/01/2008 17.47 __________ NOD32 2818 (20080123) Information __________ This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system. http://www.eset.com |
|
From: Barry N. <b.j...@op...> - 2008-01-24 15:13:19
|
There were explicit requirements to be able to mix styles at previous plenary sessions. Originally we only allowed the use of block features within graph-type flows, but not vice versa, but were asked to allow both. Barry > Hi Alex, > nice feature. But you should not be permitted to mixup the two > representations. > On on hand the tool should be clever enough to serialize to blockPattern > if > not gateway/merge > but only blockpattern are used. > On the other hand, the tool should serilize to graphPattern if > gateway/merge > > and not blockPattern are used. > If both occurs, the tool should say "incorrect modeling". > > Best, > Federico > > >> -----Messaggio originale----- >> Da: Alex Simov [mailto:ale...@on...] >> Inviato: giovedì 24 gennaio 2008 13.12 >> A: Adrian Mocan; Federico Michele Facca >> Cc: wsm...@li... >> Oggetto: Re: BPMO Editor Bug >> >> Hi Federico, Adrian, >> >> actually it's a feature;-) >> >> By default, the BPMO modeller tries to detect automatically >> sequences as block patterns (in this version of the plug-in, >> the sequences are not explicitly represented on the visual diagram). >> >> However this behavior is optional and it can be disabled by >> unselecting: >> Window > Preferences ... > WSMO Studio > BPMO Modeller > >> Enable Sequences generation on Save. >> >> Thus the diagram will be represented by graphpattern connectors only. >> >> Currently, we are developing separate representations for >> sequences as blockpatterns and as graphpattern and this >> option will be removed. >> >> And one more issue, I'd recommend reporting bugs in the >> issues tracking system of SourceForge [1] which would >> facilitate the report processing from our side. >> >> Best, >> Alex >> >> [1] >> http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=119791&atid=684995 >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Federico Michele Facca" <fa...@el...> >> To: <ale...@on...> >> Cc: "'Marin Dimitrov'" <mar...@on...> >> Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2008 12:09 PM >> Subject: BPMO Editor Bug >> >> >> > Hi Alex, >> > I'm working with Adrian Mocan on the BPMO editor to >> generate mediators. >> > We noticed a bug (relevant in my opinion) in the tool: >> > if you model a process using what you assume to be GraphPatterns, >> > the serialized model will use in some point graph patterns and >> > blockpatterns in others. This should not be possible! >> > Look at the example attached. >> > >> > Best, >> > Federico >> > >> > ---------------------------------------------- >> > Federico Michele Facca >> > Dipartimento di Elettronica e Informazione >> > Politecnico di Milano >> > Via Ponzio 34/5, >> > 20133 Milano, Italy >> > phone: +39 02 2399 3667 >> > fax: +39 02 2399 3411 >> > mobile: +39 328 408 7745 >> > web: http://dblambs.elet.polimi.it/people/federico >> > >> > No virus found in this outgoing message. >> > Checked by AVG Free Edition. >> > Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.19.10/1240 - Release Date: >> > 23/01/2008 >> > 17.47 >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > __________ NOD32 2818 (20080123) Information __________ >> > >> > This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system. >> > http://www.eset.com >> > >> > >> >> >> No virus found in this incoming message. >> Checked by AVG Free Edition. >> Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.19.10/1240 - Release >> Date: 23/01/2008 17.47 >> >> > > No virus found in this outgoing message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.19.10/1240 - Release Date: > 23/01/2008 > 17.47 > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > _______________________________________________ > > WSMO Studio * http://www.wsmostudio.org/ > Users Guide * http://www.wsmostudio.org/doc/wsmo-studio-ug.pdf > > wsmostudio-discuss mailing list * wsm...@li... > List info * > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsmostudio-discuss > |
|
From: Federico M. F. <fa...@el...> - 2008-01-24 15:10:23
|
Hi Alex, nice feature. But you should not be permitted to mixup the two representations. On on hand the tool should be clever enough to serialize to blockPattern = if not gateway/merge but only blockpattern are used. On the other hand, the tool should serilize to graphPattern if = gateway/merge and not blockPattern are used. If both occurs, the tool should say "incorrect modeling". Best, Federico =20 > -----Messaggio originale----- > Da: Alex Simov [mailto:ale...@on...]=20 > Inviato: gioved=EC 24 gennaio 2008 13.12 > A: Adrian Mocan; Federico Michele Facca > Cc: wsm...@li... > Oggetto: Re: BPMO Editor Bug >=20 > Hi Federico, Adrian, >=20 > actually it's a feature;-) >=20 > By default, the BPMO modeller tries to detect automatically=20 > sequences as block patterns (in this version of the plug-in,=20 > the sequences are not explicitly represented on the visual diagram). >=20 > However this behavior is optional and it can be disabled by=20 > unselecting: > Window > Preferences ... > WSMO Studio > BPMO Modeller >=20 > Enable Sequences generation on Save. >=20 > Thus the diagram will be represented by graphpattern connectors only. >=20 > Currently, we are developing separate representations for=20 > sequences as blockpatterns and as graphpattern and this=20 > option will be removed. >=20 > And one more issue, I'd recommend reporting bugs in the=20 > issues tracking system of SourceForge [1] which would=20 > facilitate the report processing from our side. >=20 > Best, > Alex >=20 > [1] > http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=3D119791&atid=3D684995 >=20 >=20 > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Federico Michele Facca" <fa...@el...> > To: <ale...@on...> > Cc: "'Marin Dimitrov'" <mar...@on...> > Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2008 12:09 PM > Subject: BPMO Editor Bug >=20 >=20 > > Hi Alex, > > I'm working with Adrian Mocan on the BPMO editor to=20 > generate mediators. > > We noticed a bug (relevant in my opinion) in the tool: > > if you model a process using what you assume to be GraphPatterns, > > the serialized model will use in some point graph patterns and > > blockpatterns in others. This should not be possible! > > Look at the example attached. > > > > Best, > > Federico > > > > ---------------------------------------------- > > Federico Michele Facca > > Dipartimento di Elettronica e Informazione > > Politecnico di Milano > > Via Ponzio 34/5, > > 20133 Milano, Italy > > phone: +39 02 2399 3667 > > fax: +39 02 2399 3411 > > mobile: +39 328 408 7745 > > web: http://dblambs.elet.polimi.it/people/federico > > > > No virus found in this outgoing message. > > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > > Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.19.10/1240 - Release Date:=20 > > 23/01/2008 > > 17.47 > > > > > > > > > > __________ NOD32 2818 (20080123) Information __________ > > > > This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system. > > http://www.eset.com > > > >=20 >=20 >=20 > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition.=20 > Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.19.10/1240 - Release=20 > Date: 23/01/2008 17.47 > =20 >=20 No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition.=20 Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.19.10/1240 - Release Date: = 23/01/2008 17.47 =20 |
|
From: Marin D. <mar...@on...> - 2008-01-24 13:20:44
|
Federico Michele Facca wrote: > Hi Alex, > that's weird. according to my knowledge of BPMN (which it's > similar to the graphical notation used in BPMO) > send message can be also intermediate events. BPMN message events can be start, intermediate and end events, but it seems in BPMO they are always intermediate events which means that this is a bug in WSMO Studio, which lets you model start/end message events but *not* intermediate ones (i.e. exactly the opposite of what BPMO says) we'll fix it ASAP best, Marin ---- "...what you brought from your past, is of no use in your present. When you must choose a new path, do not bring old experiences with you. Those who strike out afresh, but who attempt to retain a little of the old life, end up torn apart by their own memories. " |
|
From: Barry N. <b.j...@op...> - 2008-01-24 12:57:01
|
Alex, I'll leave it to Liliana to confirm if this has changed, but in early BPMO this is not what we intended. In fact we said that we would reduce the terminals from BPMN to a unique implicit plain terminal. Barry > Hi Federico, > > IMO, from modelling point of view this diagram is not quite correct. The > SendMessage events (similarly to End events) are terminal nodes and no > outgoing controlflow is expected. Of course the modelling tool is not that > precise in this case by allowing drawing such connections. > > > Best, > Alex > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Federico Michele Facca" <fa...@el...> > To: <ale...@on...> > Cc: "'Marin Dimitrov'" <mar...@on...> > Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2008 1:21 PM > Subject: R: BPMO Editor Bug > > > Hi, > here is another bug. > BlockPattern process are not rendered correclty when a previous saved > process is reopen. > (only in case of nested Block patterns) some connectors are not > visualized. > > Best, > Federico > >> -----Messaggio originale----- >> Da: Federico Michele Facca [mailto:fa...@el...] >> Inviato: giovedì 24 gennaio 2008 11.09 >> A: 'ale...@on...' >> Cc: 'Marin Dimitrov' >> Oggetto: BPMO Editor Bug >> >> Hi Alex, >> I'm working with Adrian Mocan on the BPMO editor to generate >> mediators. >> We noticed a bug (relevant in my opinion) in the tool: >> if you model a process using what you assume to be >> GraphPatterns, the serialized model will use in some point >> graph patterns and blockpatterns in others. This should not >> be possible! >> Look at the example attached. >> >> Best, >> Federico >> >> ---------------------------------------------- >> Federico Michele Facca >> Dipartimento di Elettronica e Informazione Politecnico di >> Milano Via Ponzio 34/5, >> 20133 Milano, Italy >> phone: +39 02 2399 3667 >> fax: +39 02 2399 3411 >> mobile: +39 328 408 7745 >> web: http://dblambs.elet.polimi.it/people/federico >> >> No virus found in this outgoing message. >> Checked by AVG Free Edition. >> Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.19.10/1240 - Release >> Date: 23/01/2008 17.47 >> >> >> > > No virus found in this outgoing message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.19.10/1240 - Release Date: > 23/01/2008 > 17.47 > > > > > __________ NOD32 2818 (20080123) Information __________ > > This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system. > http://www.eset.com > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > _______________________________________________ > > WSMO Studio * http://www.wsmostudio.org/ > Users Guide * http://www.wsmostudio.org/doc/wsmo-studio-ug.pdf > > wsmostudio-discuss mailing list * wsm...@li... > List info * > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsmostudio-discuss > |
|
From: Federico M. F. <fa...@el...> - 2008-01-24 12:42:12
|
Hi Alex, that's weird. according to my knowledge of BPMN (which it's similar to the graphical notation used in BPMO)=20 send message can be also intermediate events. Actually BPMN does'not distiguish receive and send events, the semantic is in the message flow... if the arrow enters then it's a receive, if the arrow exits is then it's a send. But I may be wrong. Best, Fderico=20 > -----Messaggio originale----- > Da: Alex Simov [mailto:ale...@on...]=20 > Inviato: gioved=EC 24 gennaio 2008 13.19 > A: Federico Michele Facca > Cc: wsm...@li... > Oggetto: Re: BPMO Editor Bug >=20 > Hi Federico, >=20 > IMO, from modelling point of view this diagram is not quite=20 > correct. The SendMessage events (similarly to End events) are=20 > terminal nodes and no outgoing controlflow is expected. Of=20 > course the modelling tool is not that precise in this case by=20 > allowing drawing such connections. >=20 >=20 > Best, > Alex >=20 >=20 > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Federico Michele Facca" <fa...@el...> > To: <ale...@on...> > Cc: "'Marin Dimitrov'" <mar...@on...> > Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2008 1:21 PM > Subject: R: BPMO Editor Bug >=20 >=20 > Hi, > here is another bug. > BlockPattern process are not rendered correclty when a previous saved > process is reopen. > (only in case of nested Block patterns) some connectors are=20 > not visualized. >=20 > Best, > Federico >=20 > > -----Messaggio originale----- > > Da: Federico Michele Facca [mailto:fa...@el...] > > Inviato: gioved=EC 24 gennaio 2008 11.09 > > A: 'ale...@on...' > > Cc: 'Marin Dimitrov' > > Oggetto: BPMO Editor Bug > > > > Hi Alex, > > I'm working with Adrian Mocan on the BPMO editor to generate > > mediators. > > We noticed a bug (relevant in my opinion) in the tool: > > if you model a process using what you assume to be > > GraphPatterns, the serialized model will use in some point > > graph patterns and blockpatterns in others. This should not > > be possible! > > Look at the example attached. > > > > Best, > > Federico > > > > ---------------------------------------------- > > Federico Michele Facca > > Dipartimento di Elettronica e Informazione Politecnico di > > Milano Via Ponzio 34/5, > > 20133 Milano, Italy > > phone: +39 02 2399 3667 > > fax: +39 02 2399 3411 > > mobile: +39 328 408 7745 > > web: http://dblambs.elet.polimi.it/people/federico > > > > No virus found in this outgoing message. > > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > > Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.19.10/1240 - Release > > Date: 23/01/2008 17.47 > > > > > > >=20 > No virus found in this outgoing message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.19.10/1240 - Release=20 > Date: 23/01/2008 > 17.47 >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > __________ NOD32 2818 (20080123) Information __________ >=20 > This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system. > http://www.eset.com >=20 >=20 >=20 > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition.=20 > Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.19.10/1240 - Release=20 > Date: 23/01/2008 17.47 > =20 >=20 No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition.=20 Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.19.10/1240 - Release Date: = 23/01/2008 17.47 =20 |
|
From: Alex S. <ale...@on...> - 2008-01-24 12:18:48
|
Hi Federico, IMO, from modelling point of view this diagram is not quite correct. The SendMessage events (similarly to End events) are terminal nodes and no outgoing controlflow is expected. Of course the modelling tool is not that precise in this case by allowing drawing such connections. Best, Alex ----- Original Message ----- From: "Federico Michele Facca" <fa...@el...> To: <ale...@on...> Cc: "'Marin Dimitrov'" <mar...@on...> Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2008 1:21 PM Subject: R: BPMO Editor Bug Hi, here is another bug. BlockPattern process are not rendered correclty when a previous saved process is reopen. (only in case of nested Block patterns) some connectors are not visualized. Best, Federico > -----Messaggio originale----- > Da: Federico Michele Facca [mailto:fa...@el...] > Inviato: giovedì 24 gennaio 2008 11.09 > A: 'ale...@on...' > Cc: 'Marin Dimitrov' > Oggetto: BPMO Editor Bug > > Hi Alex, > I'm working with Adrian Mocan on the BPMO editor to generate > mediators. > We noticed a bug (relevant in my opinion) in the tool: > if you model a process using what you assume to be > GraphPatterns, the serialized model will use in some point > graph patterns and blockpatterns in others. This should not > be possible! > Look at the example attached. > > Best, > Federico > > ---------------------------------------------- > Federico Michele Facca > Dipartimento di Elettronica e Informazione Politecnico di > Milano Via Ponzio 34/5, > 20133 Milano, Italy > phone: +39 02 2399 3667 > fax: +39 02 2399 3411 > mobile: +39 328 408 7745 > web: http://dblambs.elet.polimi.it/people/federico > > No virus found in this outgoing message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.19.10/1240 - Release > Date: 23/01/2008 17.47 > > > No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.19.10/1240 - Release Date: 23/01/2008 17.47 __________ NOD32 2818 (20080123) Information __________ This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system. http://www.eset.com |
|
From: Alex S. <ale...@on...> - 2008-01-24 12:12:23
|
Hi Federico, Adrian, actually it's a feature;-) By default, the BPMO modeller tries to detect automatically sequences as block patterns (in this version of the plug-in, the sequences are not explicitly represented on the visual diagram). However this behavior is optional and it can be disabled by unselecting: Window > Preferences ... > WSMO Studio > BPMO Modeller > Enable Sequences generation on Save. Thus the diagram will be represented by graphpattern connectors only. Currently, we are developing separate representations for sequences as blockpatterns and as graphpattern and this option will be removed. And one more issue, I'd recommend reporting bugs in the issues tracking system of SourceForge [1] which would facilitate the report processing from our side. Best, Alex [1] http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=119791&atid=684995 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Federico Michele Facca" <fa...@el...> To: <ale...@on...> Cc: "'Marin Dimitrov'" <mar...@on...> Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2008 12:09 PM Subject: BPMO Editor Bug > Hi Alex, > I'm working with Adrian Mocan on the BPMO editor to generate mediators. > We noticed a bug (relevant in my opinion) in the tool: > if you model a process using what you assume to be GraphPatterns, > the serialized model will use in some point graph patterns and > blockpatterns in others. This should not be possible! > Look at the example attached. > > Best, > Federico > > ---------------------------------------------- > Federico Michele Facca > Dipartimento di Elettronica e Informazione > Politecnico di Milano > Via Ponzio 34/5, > 20133 Milano, Italy > phone: +39 02 2399 3667 > fax: +39 02 2399 3411 > mobile: +39 328 408 7745 > web: http://dblambs.elet.polimi.it/people/federico > > No virus found in this outgoing message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.19.10/1240 - Release Date: > 23/01/2008 > 17.47 > > > > > __________ NOD32 2818 (20080123) Information __________ > > This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system. > http://www.eset.com > > |
|
From: Marin D. <mar...@on...> - 2008-01-24 10:59:12
|
-------- Original Message -------- Subject: BPMO Editor Bug Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 11:09:02 +0100 From: Federico Michele Facca <fa...@el...> To: <ale...@on...> CC: 'Marin Dimitrov' <mar...@on...> Hi Alex, I'm working with Adrian Mocan on the BPMO editor to generate mediators. We noticed a bug (relevant in my opinion) in the tool: if you model a process using what you assume to be GraphPatterns, the serialized model will use in some point graph patterns and blockpatterns in others. This should not be possible! Look at the example attached. Best, Federico ---------------------------------------------- Federico Michele Facca Dipartimento di Elettronica e Informazione Politecnico di Milano Via Ponzio 34/5, 20133 Milano, Italy phone: +39 02 2399 3667 fax: +39 02 2399 3411 mobile: +39 328 408 7745 web: http://dblambs.elet.polimi.it/people/federico |
|
From: <np...@ti...> - 2008-01-16 14:19:57
|
Ok, thank you for the clarification, but for me it was an aid to develop ontologies :-) Regards =20 =20 _____ =20 De: Alex Simov [mailto:ale...@on...]=20 Enviado el: mi=E9rcoles, 16 de enero de 2008 13:53 Para: Noelia P=E9rez Crespo CC: wsm...@li... Asunto: Re: [wsmo-studio-discuss] WSMO studio-- ontologies edition =20 Dear Noelia, =20 this is the intended behavior of the Studio. In previous versions it was rather a bug than a feature. The problem was that local definitions were not distinguishable from the imported ones. =20 Best, Alex =20 ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Noelia P=E9rez Crespo <mailto:np...@ti...> =20 To: 'Alex <mailto:ale...@on...> Simov'=20 Cc: wsm...@li...=20 Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2008 12:27 PM Subject: Re: [wsmo-studio-discuss] WSMO studio-- ontologies edition =20 Sorry, perhaps I forgot to say that instances and concepts are in = different files. Please, find attached two simple ontologies as an example. Regards =20 =20 _____ =20 De: Alex Simov [mailto:ale...@on...]=20 Enviado el: mi=E9rcoles, 16 de enero de 2008 10:41 Para: Noelia P=E9rez Crespo CC: wsm...@li... Asunto: Re: WSMO studio-- ontologies edition =20 Dear Noelia, =20 I'm trying to reproduce the problem but up to now without any success. = Are you creating new instances through the WSMO Navigator view or in any = other way? =20 Is the ontology you're visualizing the host ontology for the new = instances or it is imported by another ontology which contains the new instances = (in the latter case the behavior is normal) ? =20 Sending the error log file (zipped) located in workspace\.metadata\.log could also be helpful. =20 Best regards, Alex =20 ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Noelia P=E9rez Crespo <mailto:np...@ti...> =20 To: 'Alex <mailto:ale...@on...> Simov' ; 'SUPER WP5' <mailto:sup...@li...> =20 Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2008 10:29 AM Subject: WSMO studio-- ontologies edition =20 Dear all, I=92m testing WSMO Studio and I think now there is a problem with = ontologies edition that didn=92t exist before: It is regarding the visualization of the ontologies (WSMO navigator = view) When I create ontology instances I can not see them when I=92m = visualizing the ontology (allocated in the right place) as previous versions of WSMO = studio. To explain it better I have attached a picture of what I mean (in last version I can not see the instances as is presented in the picture) Regards --Noelia =20 __________ NOD32 2795 (20080116) Information __________ This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system. http://www.eset.com _____ =20 -------------------------------------------------------------------------= This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ __________ NOD32 2795 (20080116) Information __________ This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system. http://www.eset.com _____ =20 _______________________________________________ WSMO Studio * http://www.wsmostudio.org/ Users Guide * http://www.wsmostudio.org/doc/wsmo-studio-ug.pdf wsmostudio-discuss mailing list * = wsm...@li... List info * = https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsmostudio-discuss __________ NOD32 2795 (20080116) Information __________ This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system. http://www.eset.com |
|
From: Alex S. <ale...@on...> - 2008-01-16 12:53:17
|
Dear Noelia,
this is the intended behavior of the Studio. In previous versions it was =
rather a bug than a feature.
The problem was that local definitions were not distinguishable from the =
imported ones.
Best,
Alex
----- Original Message -----=20
From: Noelia P=E9rez Crespo=20
To: 'Alex Simov'=20
Cc: wsm...@li...=20
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2008 12:27 PM
Subject: Re: [wsmo-studio-discuss] WSMO studio-- ontologies edition
Sorry, perhaps I forgot to say that instances and concepts are in =
different files.
Please, find attached two simple ontologies as an example.
Regards
=20
=20
-------------------------------------------------------------------------=
-----
De: Alex Simov [mailto:ale...@on...]=20
Enviado el: mi=E9rcoles, 16 de enero de 2008 10:41
Para: Noelia P=E9rez Crespo
CC: wsm...@li...
Asunto: Re: WSMO studio-- ontologies edition
=20
Dear Noelia,
=20
I'm trying to reproduce the problem but up to now without any success. =
Are you creating new instances through the WSMO Navigator view or in any =
other way?
=20
Is the ontology you're visualizing the host ontology for the new =
instances or it is imported by another ontology which contains the new =
instances (in the latter case the behavior is normal) ?
=20
Sending the error log file (zipped) located in =
workspace\.metadata\.log could also be helpful.
=20
Best regards,
Alex
=20
----- Original Message -----=20
From: Noelia P=E9rez Crespo=20
To: 'Alex Simov' ; 'SUPER WP5'=20
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2008 10:29 AM
Subject: WSMO studio-- ontologies edition
=20
Dear all,
I'm testing WSMO Studio and I think now there is a problem with =
ontologies edition that didn't exist before:
It is regarding the visualization of the ontologies (WSMO navigator =
view) When I create ontology instances I can not see them when I'm =
visualizing the ontology (allocated in the right place) as previous =
versions of WSMO studio.
To explain it better I have attached a picture of what I mean (in =
last version I can not see the instances as is presented in the picture)
Regards
--Noelia
=20
__________ NOD32 2795 (20080116) Information __________
This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
http://www.eset.com
-------------------------------------------------------------------------=
-----
=
-------------------------------------------------------------------------=
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
__________ NOD32 2795 (20080116) Information __________
This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
http://www.eset.com
-------------------------------------------------------------------------=
-----
_______________________________________________
WSMO Studio * http://www.wsmostudio.org/
Users Guide * http://www.wsmostudio.org/doc/wsmo-studio-ug.pdf
wsmostudio-discuss mailing list * =
wsm...@li...
List info * =
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsmostudio-discuss
__________ NOD32 2795 (20080116) Information __________
This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
http://www.eset.com
|
|
From: Alex S. <ale...@on...> - 2008-01-16 09:41:09
|
Dear Noelia, I'm trying to reproduce the problem but up to now without any success. = Are you creating new instances through the WSMO Navigator view or in any = other way? Is the ontology you're visualizing the host ontology for the new = instances or it is imported by another ontology which contains the new = instances (in the latter case the behavior is normal) ? Sending the error log file (zipped) located in workspace\.metadata\.log = could also be helpful. Best regards, Alex ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Noelia P=E9rez Crespo=20 To: 'Alex Simov' ; 'SUPER WP5'=20 Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2008 10:29 AM Subject: WSMO studio-- ontologies edition Dear all, I'm testing WSMO Studio and I think now there is a problem with = ontologies edition that didn't exist before: It is regarding the visualization of the ontologies (WSMO navigator = view) When I create ontology instances I can not see them when I'm = visualizing the ontology (allocated in the right place) as previous = versions of WSMO studio. To explain it better I have attached a picture of what I mean (in last = version I can not see the instances as is presented in the picture) Regards --Noelia =20 |
|
From: Mihail K. <mih...@on...> - 2008-01-15 10:20:18
|
Hi Graham, The major.minor version of WSML2Reasoner classes is 49.00 which is Java5, but for the IRIS (20070731) it is 50.0 which is Java6. I checked the new version of IRIS (v0.5) and it is really 49.00. I tried to replace the JARs with the current versions, but I got NPE, so I will get back to you when I have a fix. Best, Mihail Graham J Hench wrote: > Hey Carlos, > Not sure exactly what you guys are after, or from where the problem is > arising, because WSML2Reasoner and IRIS *are* built with Java 5 (we've > yet to upgrade to Java 6). > > Let me know. > > Cheers, > Graham > > > Carlos Pedrinaci wrote: >> Yes I agree. >> Graham, any possibility to get a Java 5 version of IRIS? >> -- >> Dr. Carlos Pedrinaci >> Knowledge Media Institute - The Open University >> Walton Hall, Milton Keynes, MK7 6AA United Kingdom >> >> Tel: +44 1908 654773 >> Fax: +44 1908 653169 >> >> >> >> On 14 Jan 2008, at 08:30, Mark Evenson wrote: >> >>> >>> On Fri, 2008-01-11 at 18:28 +0200, Mihail Konstantinov wrote: >>>> Hi Carlos, >>>> >>>> You need Java6, because IRIS and WSML2Reasoner JARs are built with >>>> Java6. >>> >>> Then you should remove the Mac OS X ports, as there is no production >>> Java 6 available for this platform. >>> >>> I don't think there is any inherent reason why IRIS and wsml2reasoner >>> should need Java 6, so maybe we can get STI Innsbruck to recompile >>> them? >>> >>> >>> <Mar...@et... <mailto:Mar...@et...>> >> > |
|
From: Graham J H. <gra...@de...> - 2008-01-14 14:16:50
|
Hey Carlos, Not sure exactly what you guys are after, or from where the problem is arising, because WSML2Reasoner and IRIS *are* built with Java 5 (we've yet to upgrade to Java 6). Let me know. Cheers, Graham Carlos Pedrinaci wrote: > Yes I agree. > Graham, any possibility to get a Java 5 version of IRIS? > -- > Dr. Carlos Pedrinaci > Knowledge Media Institute - The Open University > Walton Hall, Milton Keynes, MK7 6AA > United Kingdom > > Tel: +44 1908 654773 > Fax: +44 1908 653169 > > > > On 14 Jan 2008, at 08:30, Mark Evenson wrote: > >> >> On Fri, 2008-01-11 at 18:28 +0200, Mihail Konstantinov wrote: >>> Hi Carlos, >>> >>> You need Java6, because IRIS and WSML2Reasoner JARs are built with Java6. >> >> Then you should remove the Mac OS X ports, as there is no production >> Java 6 available for this platform. >> >> I don't think there is any inherent reason why IRIS and wsml2reasoner >> should need Java 6, so maybe we can get STI Innsbruck to recompile them? >> >> >> <Mar...@et... <mailto:Mar...@et...>> > |
|
From: Carlos P. <c.p...@op...> - 2008-01-14 11:45:09
|
Yes I agree. Graham, any possibility to get a Java 5 version of IRIS? -- Dr. Carlos Pedrinaci Knowledge Media Institute - The Open University Walton Hall, Milton Keynes, MK7 6AA United Kingdom Tel: +44 1908 654773 Fax: +44 1908 653169 On 14 Jan 2008, at 08:30, Mark Evenson wrote: > > On Fri, 2008-01-11 at 18:28 +0200, Mihail Konstantinov wrote: >> Hi Carlos, >> >> You need Java6, because IRIS and WSML2Reasoner JARs are built with >> Java6. > > Then you should remove the Mac OS X ports, as there is no production > Java 6 available for this platform. > > I don't think there is any inherent reason why IRIS and wsml2reasoner > should need Java 6, so maybe we can get STI Innsbruck to recompile > them? > > > <Mar...@et...> |
|
From: Mark E. <mar...@et...> - 2008-01-14 08:30:54
|
On Fri, 2008-01-11 at 18:28 +0200, Mihail Konstantinov wrote: > Hi Carlos, > > You need Java6, because IRIS and WSML2Reasoner JARs are built with Java6. Then you should remove the Mac OS X ports, as there is no production Java 6 available for this platform. I don't think there is any inherent reason why IRIS and wsml2reasoner should need Java 6, so maybe we can get STI Innsbruck to recompile them? <Mar...@et...> |
|
From: Carlos P. <c.p...@op...> - 2008-01-11 18:26:53
|
I see. Thanks for the information Mihail. Hopefully the developers release of Java SE 6 for Mac OSX works ok. I'll give it a go and will let you know. Thanks, Carlos -- Dr. Carlos Pedrinaci Knowledge Media Institute - The Open University Walton Hall, Milton Keynes, MK7 6AA United Kingdom Tel: +44 1908 654773 Fax: +44 1908 653169 On 11 Jan 2008, at 16:28, Mihail Konstantinov wrote: > Hi Carlos, > > You need Java6, because IRIS and WSML2Reasoner JARs are built with > Java6. > > > Best, > Mihail > > Marin Dimitrov wrote: >> -------- Original Message -------- >> Subject: IRIS in WSMO Studio 0.7.2 >> Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 16:15:13 +0000 >> From: Carlos Pedrinaci <c.p...@op...> >> To: Marin Dimitrov <mar...@on...> >> >> >> >> Hi Marin, >> We have been trying to use the reasoner within WSMO Studio 0.7.2 >> in Mac >> and we get a message saying that the libraries could not be loaded. >> According to the FAQ (http://www.wsmostudio.org/faq.html#wsml- >> reasoner) >> IRIS is bundled by default. Has this changed lately? >> If this is not the case, shall I create a ticket for this in >> Sourceforge? >> >> Cheers, >> Carlos >> >> PS: In the FAQ you have a small typo: "WSML Reasiner GUI" >> >> -- >> Dr. Carlos Pedrinaci >> Knowledge Media Institute - The Open University >> Walton Hall, Milton Keynes, MK7 6AA >> United Kingdom >> >> Tel: +44 1908 654773 >> Fax: +44 1908 653169 >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> ---- >> Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. >> It's the best place to buy or sell services for >> just about anything Open Source. >> http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/ >> marketplace >> _______________________________________________ >> >> WSMO Studio * http://www.wsmostudio.org/ >> Users Guide * http://www.wsmostudio.org/doc/wsmo-studio-ug.pdf >> >> wsmostudio-discuss mailing list * wsmostudio- >> di...@li... >> List info * https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ >> wsmostudio-discuss >> >> >> <mihail.konstantinov.vcf> |
5 messages has been excluded from this view by a project administrator.