From: Marco C. <PY...@ou...> - 2025-05-12 21:24:58
|
Hi Andy! In reality I was asking in general the correct usage of CW-ID, which at least here it seems is not working. Then I would like to get the confirmation about it. Best regards, Marco, PY1ZRJ Il 12/05/25 09:05, Andrew Neumeier via wsjt-devel ha scritto: > Marco is referring I think only to the use of the cw ID while using > the short message format on 2 meter msk144. On that band/mode > operators do not exchange signal reports and turn to the short message > format (known as Sh) to complete a meteor scatter qso with quickly > decaying meteor trails. Time is of the essence. However, a > monitoring station often can not decode the callsigns of stations > using the Sh format. With this in mind, two meter meteor scatter > operators, when involved in a particularly long qso, will use the > cw-id to identify their station to comply with regulations. Meteor > scatter contacts on 2 meters can take a long time, I've seen them last > a hour or more. > > Sometimes the use of the SWL format, (ticking the SWL box in MSK144) > will reveal the callsign of the station using the Sh format, but > sometimes it does not. Hence he use of the cw-ID. > > 73, > Andy, ka2uqw > > > > > _______________________________________________ > wsjt-devel mailing list > wsj...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel --- *73 de Marco, PY1ZRJ (former IK5BCU)* ** |