|
From: Marco C. <PY...@ou...> - 2022-11-05 15:20:45
|
Well,
IMHO this issue is pretty annoying also because from the lock stale
warning window we cannot remove the file and as I told in other
occasions, the same problem is present in every WSJT-X release I used
from the very beginning.
Beside this, more precisely with 2.6.0 RC4, I noticed an increase of
occurrences of the processes hanging in the background (I think it being
the JT9 process...) and a manual intervention is necessary to kill them
in order to restart the main program.
In addition from time to time, I noticed with RC4 a sudden lost of audio
communication (both in TX and RX) between WSJT-X and the default
computer sound system and again to get it sorted out, I need to delete
the WSJT-X.lock file by hand and restart the main program.
Regards,
---
*73 de Marco, PY1ZRJ (former IK5BCU)*
**
Il 05/11/22 10:06, Adrian via wsjt-devel ha scritto:
> I see this from time to time, rectified with 'sudo pkill wsjtx' and
>
> then no problem to start a new session.. If linux > wsjtx ran a
> startup script killing first,
>
> then there would never be an issue.
>
>
> 73
>
>
> Adrian Fewster
>
> On 5/11/22 22:56, leo bistmans via wsjt-devel wrote:
>> Via strace I saw the lock file that is not there is /tmp/WSJT-X ...
>> .lock
>>
>>
>> openat(AT_FDCWD, "/tmp/WSJT-X - ft-891.lock",
>> O_RDWR|O_CREAT|O_EXCL|O_CLOEXEC, 0666) = 13
>> flock(13, LOCK_EX|LOCK_NB) = 0
>>
>> If I create it myself with touch, the switch code below is used
>> instead of throwing the fatal error.
>>
>> The code in main.cpp:
>>
>> // disallow multiple instances with same instance key
>> QLockFile instance_lock {temp_dir.absoluteFilePath
>> (a.applicationName () + ".lock")};
>> instance_lock.setStaleLockTime (0);
>> while (!instance_lock.tryLock ())
>> {
>> if (QLockFile::LockFailedError == instance_lock.error ())
>> {
>> auto button = MessageBox::query_message (nullptr
>> , "Another
>> instance may be running"
>> , "try to
>> remove stale lock file?"
>> , QString {}
>> ,
>> MessageBox::Yes | MessageBox::Retry | MessageBox::No
>> ,
>> MessageBox::Yes);
>> switch (button)
>> {
>> case MessageBox::Yes:
>> instance_lock.removeStaleLockFile ();
>> break;
>>
>> case MessageBox::Retry:
>> break;
>>
>> default:
>> throw std::runtime_error {"Multiple instances must
>> have unique rig names"};
>> }
>> }
>> else
>> {
>> throw std::runtime_error {"Failed to access lock file"};
>> }
>> }
>>
>> The reason that I do not have the .lock file in /tmp is an open
>> question to me ( possibly a disk full condition? ).
>> However I think it is fairly safe for wsjt-x to just start instead of
>> forcing me to reboot my PC.
>>
>> 73 de on1aad
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> wsjt-devel mailing list
>> wsj...@li...
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> wsjt-devel mailing list
> wsj...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
|