From: Laurie, V. <_vk...@vk...> - 2021-09-15 07:03:11
|
On 15/09/2021 4:27 pm, Saku via wsjt-devel wrote: > f wsjt-x decode is set to "Normal" or "Deep" I would rather say > "slightly better, in some cases". That has been my experience as well. On the surface JTDX offers a greater number of decodes, but many were false decodes. If JTDX is truly offering superior decoding have any patches been submitted to the wsjtx dev-team by the jtdx people? de Laurie VK3AMA |