Menu
▾
▴
wrapper-user
|
From: Felipe N. L. <fel...@ch...> - 2004-04-15 14:08:23
|
The working directory when I run my application is the directory where = the Wrapper.exe resides. Is there a way to change that using the = wrapper.conf file (version 3.0.5)? Felipe N. Lavoura Desenvolvimento de Sistemas Choose Technologies Tel.: (11) 3062-6133 (ramal 20) |
|
From: Leif M. <le...@ta...> - 2004-04-15 15:10:12
|
Felipe,
This is possible as of 3.1.0 using the new wrapper.working.dir
property. Be sure
to read the docs on this property before trying it out. There are some
interactions
that you need to be aware of to avoid problems.
http://wrapper.tanukisoftware.org/doc/english/prop-working-dir.html
Cheers,
Leif
Felipe N. Lavoura wrote:
> The working directory when I run my application is the directory where
> the Wrapper.exe resides. Is there a way to change that using the
> wrapper.conf file (version 3.0.5)?
>
> Felipe N. Lavoura
> Desenvolvimento de Sistemas
> Choose Technologies
> Tel.: (11) 3062-6133 (ramal 20)
|
|
From: Jacques B. <jac...@gm...> - 2004-04-16 06:35:49
|
Hi there Leif. Just a quick question: Been using version 3.0.5 in some apps. Will I be able to switch to 3.1.0 (dll, exe, and jar) without changing anything else (config)? Thanx much. Jacques |
|
From: Leif M. <le...@ta...> - 2004-04-16 11:36:21
|
Yes. I go to great effort to make sure that all wrapper.conf files are forward compatible. The only exception that I am aware of to date was when I added support for wrapper.pidfile to the Windows version. Cheers, Leif Jacques Bosch wrote: >Hi there Leif. > >Just a quick question: Been using version 3.0.5 in some apps. Will I be able >to switch to 3.1.0 (dll, exe, and jar) without changing anything else >(config)? > >Thanx much. > >Jacques > > > >------------------------------------------------------- >This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials >Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of >GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system >administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click >_______________________________________________ >Wrapper-user mailing list >Wra...@li... >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wrapper-user > > > |
|
From: Jacques B. <jac...@gm...> - 2004-04-16 12:12:45
|
Thanx much, Leif! Jacques ----- Original Message ----- From: "Leif Mortenson" <le...@ta...> To: <wra...@li...> Sent: Friday, April 16, 2004 1:35 PM Subject: Re: [Wrapper-user] From V 3.0.5 to 3.1.0. > Yes. I go to great effort to make sure that all wrapper.conf files are > forward > compatible. The only exception that I am aware of to date was when I added > support for wrapper.pidfile to the Windows version. > > Cheers, > Leif > > Jacques Bosch wrote: > > >Hi there Leif. > > > >Just a quick question: Been using version 3.0.5 in some apps. Will I be able > >to switch to 3.1.0 (dll, exe, and jar) without changing anything else > >(config)? > > > >Thanx much. > > > >Jacques > > > > > > > >------------------------------------------------------- > >This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials > >Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of > >GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system > >administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click > >_______________________________________________ > >Wrapper-user mailing list > >Wra...@li... > >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wrapper-user > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials > Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of > GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system > administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click > _______________________________________________ > Wrapper-user mailing list > Wra...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wrapper-user > > > |
|
From: Jacques B. <jac...@gm...> - 2004-04-16 12:42:32
|
Here's another basic question. Is the wrapper.jar file in the win32 and linux distros the same one / interchangeable? I'm sure it is, but just to be sure... Thanx. Jacques |
|
From: Andy B. <aba...@ca...> - 2004-04-16 13:42:31
|
I believe the jar files should be interchangeable. I'm currently running the same 3.0.5 wrapper.jar file on Mac OS X, Solaris, and Linux. --- Andy Barnett <aba...@ca...> Cantilever Technologies --- On Apr 16, 2004, at 7:41 AM, Jacques Bosch wrote: > Here's another basic question. > Is the wrapper.jar file in the win32 and linux distros the same one / > interchangeable? > I'm sure it is, but just to be sure... > > Thanx. > Jacques |
|
From: Jacques B. <jac...@gm...> - 2004-04-16 14:17:56
|
OK, thanx. I thought so. :) J ----- Original Message ----- From: "Andy Barnett" <aba...@ca...> To: <wra...@li...> Sent: Friday, April 16, 2004 3:42 PM Subject: Re: [Wrapper-user] wrapper.jar interchangeable? > I believe the jar files should be interchangeable. I'm currently > running the same 3.0.5 wrapper.jar file on Mac OS X, Solaris, and > Linux. > > --- > Andy Barnett <aba...@ca...> > Cantilever Technologies > --- > > On Apr 16, 2004, at 7:41 AM, Jacques Bosch wrote: > > > Here's another basic question. > > Is the wrapper.jar file in the win32 and linux distros the same one / > > interchangeable? > > I'm sure it is, but just to be sure... > > > > Thanx. > > Jacques > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials > Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of > GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system > administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click > _______________________________________________ > Wrapper-user mailing list > Wra...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wrapper-user > > > |
|
From: Leif M. <le...@ta...> - 2004-04-16 15:14:12
|
Jacques,
The wrapper.jar file is technically the same for all platforms. It
is built for each
distribution on the various platforms. I have a few people help me out
with the
releases , so the builds are made with slightly different JDK versions.
This results
in the jar file having a slightly different size depending on where it
was built.
All in all this shouldn't matter to you. The exception is that I
have found that
it you build the jar with JDK 1.4.1 or above then you will get errors
when running
under a 1.2.x JVM. I usually do Windows releases using the 1.3.1 JDK
so this
is not an issue. But this is not true for other releases. If you are
going to be using
the 1.2.x JVM, I would make use of the jar from the Windows release.
This shouldn't matter, even though the compiler is told to build a
1.2 version of
class files, it seems to screw things up. Seems like a Java bug, but
not much that
can be done about it. Not many people are using 1.2.x anymore so it is
probably
not much of an issue.
Cheers,
Leif
Jacques Bosch wrote:
>Here's another basic question.
>Is the wrapper.jar file in the win32 and linux distros the same one /
>interchangeable?
>I'm sure it is, but just to be sure...
>
>Thanx.
>Jacques
>
>
|
|
From: Jacques B. <jac...@gm...> - 2004-04-16 19:25:15
|
OK, thanx for the info. I'm using 1.4.x all the way, so it won't be a problem. :) Thanx much! Jacques ----- Original Message ----- From: "Leif Mortenson" <le...@ta...> To: <wra...@li...> Sent: Friday, April 16, 2004 5:12 PM Subject: Re: [Wrapper-user] wrapper.jar interchangeable? > Jacques, > The wrapper.jar file is technically the same for all platforms. It > is built for each > distribution on the various platforms. I have a few people help me out > with the > releases , so the builds are made with slightly different JDK versions. > This results > in the jar file having a slightly different size depending on where it > was built. > > All in all this shouldn't matter to you. The exception is that I > have found that > it you build the jar with JDK 1.4.1 or above then you will get errors > when running > under a 1.2.x JVM. I usually do Windows releases using the 1.3.1 JDK > so this > is not an issue. But this is not true for other releases. If you are > going to be using > the 1.2.x JVM, I would make use of the jar from the Windows release. > This shouldn't matter, even though the compiler is told to build a > 1.2 version of > class files, it seems to screw things up. Seems like a Java bug, but > not much that > can be done about it. Not many people are using 1.2.x anymore so it is > probably > not much of an issue. > > Cheers, > Leif > > Jacques Bosch wrote: > > >Here's another basic question. > >Is the wrapper.jar file in the win32 and linux distros the same one / > >interchangeable? > >I'm sure it is, but just to be sure... > > > >Thanx. > >Jacques > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials > Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of > GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system > administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click > _______________________________________________ > Wrapper-user mailing list > Wra...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wrapper-user > > > |
