Re: [Wrapper-user] Truncated log entries

[Rick S. <rs...@as...>]

Leif,
   Some of our messages are pretty large(ie Base64 encoding of images, 
don't ask... :-[ ).
I think it is quite reasonable for there to be a fixed limit. I would 
propose 2048 or 4096
characters even. I would hazard to guess that performance would not 
degrade too badly
given a larger fixed buffer.

What do you think?

Rick

Leif Mortenson wrote:

> Rick,
>    Currently for performance reasons, a fixed buffer is used when 
> reading the JVM
> output.   The way it is implemented, this causes a linefeed each 1024 
> characters
> for very long lines.   There is not a way to change this behavior in 
> the current release.
> I will look into getting that cleaned up.   It has been a minor 
> annoyance in a couple
> of my applications as well.
>    At some point, I want to make the buffer dynamically scale.  But I 
> am trying to
> get a release out.  If it is within reason, I can quickly up the size 
> a bit.  How long are
> the lines you are trying to log?
>
>    Glad to hear we are helping with mental health in our own little 
> way. :-)
>
> Cheers,
> Leif
>
> Rick Szeto wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>  I am experiencing long logs entries to the console logfile being 
>> truncated. Is there a configuration parameter I missing that will fix 
>> this? Or is this a know problem?
>>
>> Any help would be greatly appricated.
>>
>> BTW, the wrapper is the only thing that is keeping me sane in our 
>> production environment.
>> Thanks.
>>
>> Rick Szeto
>
>
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training.
> Attend Black Hat Briefings & Training, Las Vegas July 24-29 - digital 
> self defense, top technical experts, no vendor pitches, unmatched 
> networking opportunities. Visit www.blackhat.com
> _______________________________________________
> Wrapper-user mailing list
> Wra...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wrapper-user
>
> .
>