#116 Warnings during build

closed-wont-fix
nobody
5
2013-04-13
2013-04-13
othyro
No

gmake[1]: Entering directory `/usr/pkgsrc/dev/wip/wput/work/wput-0.6.2/src'
cc -mfpmath=sse -msse3 -march=native -I/usr/pkgsrc/pkg/include -I/usr/pkgsrc/pkg/include/gettext -Wall -g -DLOCALEDIR=\"/usr/pkgsrc/pkg/share/locale\" -I/usr/pkgsrc/pkg/include -I/usr/pkgsrc/pkg/include/gettext -c -o wput.o wput.c
wput.c: In function 'readwputrc':
wput.c:586:11: warning: cast to pointer from integer of different size
wput.c: In function 'commandlineoptions':
wput.c:680:17: warning: format '%d' expects type 'int', but argument 3 has type 'long unsigned int'
wput.c:680:17: warning: format '%d' expects type 'int', but argument 3 has type 'long unsigned int'

Testing on NetBSD 6.0.1/amd64 with:

% gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=gcc
Target: x86_64--netbsd
Configured with: /usr/src2/tools/gcc/../../external/gpl3/gcc/dist/configure --target=x86_64--netbsd --enable-long-long --enable-threads --with-bugurl=http://www.NetBSD.org/Misc/send-pr.html --with-pkgversion='NetBSD nb2 20111202' --enable-__cxa_atexit --with-tune=nocona --with-mpc=/var/obj/mknative/amd64/usr/src2/destdir.amd64/usr --with-mpfr=/var/obj/mknative/amd64/usr/src2/destdir.amd64/usr --with-gmp=/var/obj/mknative/amd64/usr/src2/destdir.amd64/usr --enable-tls --disable-multilib --disable-symvers --disable-libstdcxx-pch --build=x86_64-unknown-netbsd5.99.56 --host=x86_64--netbsd
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.5.3 (NetBSD nb2 20110806)

Discussion

  • othyro

    othyro - 2013-04-13

    Category -> Build Scripts

     
  • othyro

    othyro - 2013-04-13
    • labels: --> Build Scripts
     
  • Rumpeltux

    Rumpeltux - 2013-04-13
    • status: open --> closed-wont-fix
     
  • Rumpeltux

    Rumpeltux - 2013-04-13

    Thanks for the info, but I’m not actively maintaining wput anymore. I’ll integrate according patches, but that’s about it, sorry.

     
  • othyro

    othyro - 2013-04-13

    I might have time to look into that. If you're not actively maintaining wput, would you still consider versioning a tarball every and then for these patches which are committed?

     
  • Rumpeltux

    Rumpeltux - 2013-04-13

    That’s great to hear. Sure, I can publish a new tarball every now and then.

     

Log in to post a comment.