Re: [Wpg-proxy-development] design details and impact on unittesting

[<ju...@ag...>]

Of course, when I said "ant clean", I meant "ant" ;)

2007/1/29, Juan Gonz=E1lez <ju...@ag...>:
>
> Hi back,
>
> >   Juan,
> >
> > Sorry, my mistake, that looks good.
> >
> > Thanks, John
> >
>
> I didnt explain myself  very well on the "new" test target, sorry for my
> side too.
>  I forgot to mention  that i've also added a new arg to the javac command
> (-Xlint:unchecked) which show unsafe usages on classes that support Gener=
ics
> (like Vector, Map,...), as soon as you confirm which classes will stay th=
e
> same after the re-struct  Alan and you are working on I would like to cle=
an
> all up and use type-safe generics whenever is possible (this helps to
> understand the code and bulletproof it against many mistakes we may make)=
.
>
> Please, take a look at the current output of "ant clean" and tell me what
> you think of all these.
>
> Thanks, Juan
>