Re: [Wpg-proxy-development] design details and impact on unittesting

[John S. <jo...@we...>]

Juan,

Sorry, my mistake, that looks good.

Thanks, John

=20

=20

=20


  _____ =20

From: wpg...@li...
[mailto:wpg...@li...] On Behalf =
Of
Juan Gonz=E1lez
Sent: Monday, January 29, 2007 3:23 PM
To: wpg...@li...
Subject: Re: [Wpg-proxy-development] design details and impact on
unittesting

=20

Hi john,

2007/1/29, John Southerland <jo...@we...>:

Juan,

Considering we are starting from scratch I see nothing wrong with =
upgrading
our junit version, however isn't their already a "test" build.xml =
target?
Can't we just use that?

Thanks, John=20

Well, that target just compiles the tests, but what I added compiles =
them
(through compile-test target) AND run them using the ant =
infraestructure,
which (at least for me) is more adequate, but as I uploaded it to svn, =
just
look at the updated file, and if you prefer we'll get back to the
just-compile version.=20