Re: [Wpg-proxy-development] SSL for Java HTTP proxy library

[John S. <jo...@we...>]

Juan,

Can you add your build libraries and such to the svn repository?

I am getting errors when I try to build on the command line, and it =
seems to
reorg deleted my libraries, it is a little ugly for us command line guys =
;)

Thanks, John

=20

John Buren Southerland

Principal Consultant

 <http://www.webperformancegroup.com/> Web Performance Group

801.467.8090(office)

214.734.8099(cell)

 <mailto:jo...@we...> jo...@we...

=20

=20

=20


  _____ =20

From: wpg...@li...
[mailto:wpg...@li...] On Behalf =
Of
Juan Gonz=E1lez
Sent: Saturday, January 13, 2007 12:41 PM
To: wpg...@li...
Subject: Re: [Wpg-proxy-development] SSL for Java HTTP proxy library

=20

Hi there,
  well, i'm not an usual IM user, but as everybody I keep an account on =
MSN
for emergencies ;)

MSN : op...@ho...

Cheers

2007/1/13, John Southerland <jo...@we...>:

Alan,
Your in!  that sounds great, I have been killing myself trying to figure =
out
the SSL stuff and this should teach me quite a bit :)
Please join the developers mailing list so we can track these =
discussions a=20
little better.
I have never used skype, but I will look into it, I do however use =
instant
messenger and have ids on all the major providers,
AIM =3D=3D JohnSoutherland5
Yahoo =3D jbsouthe
MSN =3D jbs...@ho...
Maybe we can start with that, and see if we need to speak in person.  I =
can
also just go ahead and call you direct if need be.

Once you and Juan, the other developer joining us, join the mailing list =
I=20
will send out an email detailing what I envisioned and then maybe we can
toss it around and spit out something we all need and see as practicle.

I originally just used a library called ExProxy written but not =
opensourced=20
by a man in France.  He has somewhat disappeared off the planet and is
unreachable.  I always thought this should be opensourced rather than =
just
free so I started this project.  The library is based mainly on his.  It =
may

prove helpful to take a look at his implementation, but we can do =
anything
we like.

I was hoping to verify all the HTTP/1.0 functionality as well as SSL =
support
via the CONNECT method for version 1.0.0, then start adding HTTP/1.1 TLS =

upgrade and misc support for version 1.1.0 or 2.0.0 as we find =
appropriate.


Well looks like I spelled it out here, so I will just cc Juan and the
mailing list to ensure it is searchable one day ;)
Later, John=20

John Buren Southerland
Principal Consultant
Web Performance Group
801.467.8090(office)
214.734.8099(cell)
jo...@we...

=20