From: fess <fe...@fe...> - 2006-12-09 00:15:46
|
On Dec 8, 2006, at 3:13 PM, Jason Stone wrote: > >>> wigwam 4 is better and even more obscure because no one switched >>> to it. > > tell me more about wigwam-4. is there documentation? of > particular use would be a side-by-side, "here's the old way to do > foo, here's the new way to do foo, here's the old way to do bar, > here's the new way to do bar," etc. is there such a thing? there's a migration guide on this page: http://wigwam-framework.org/documentation.html don't know if it's clear enough. > I seem to remember fess or paulie asking me about how to make a > safe setuid chroot wrapper. did that ever happen? no we didn't get anywhere with that. That was an attempt to further reduce dependancies on the base system, another wigwam deficiency is that the boundry between wigwam and the base system is blurry to say the least. --fess |