From: Dave B. <da...@ff...> - 2004-01-29 19:01:03
|
On Fri, Jan 23, 2004 at 09:22:26AM -0800, Paul Mineiro wrote: > On Fri, 23 Jan 2004, Dave Benson wrote: > > > > it's a question of how smart the maintainer mode is, wrt if a different > > > version of automake/autoconf is installed on the box than the one > > > "intended" to bootstrap the project. i don't know enough about that > > > magic "missing" script that automake uses ... but not enabling maintainer > > > mode seems safest in, e.g., a publish situation. > > > > > > so chris' suggestion of installing automake/autoconf into the project if > > > you're gonna regen configure seems appropriate. > > > > i think there's some confusion... by default, configure will > > include rebuild rules that don't require, but will use, the autotools. > > right, so, if there is _no_ automake/autoconf locally, "missing" does > the right thing. > > but what if there is one, with a version mismatch? sorry, i misread the original intention / got confused due to this terminology confusion: the effect of AM_MAINTAINER_MODE() is to *inhibit* maintainer mode, by default. - dave |