Re: [Wigwam-devel] mysql not relocatable

[John F. <fe...@dd...>]

I do not recall. 

however I did publish all your updates. 

--fess

On Tue, 26 Feb 2002, Paul Mineiro wrote:

> hey, as you may have noticed, i've been migrating codegrok packages to
> the public repository.
> 
> so, the previous mysql package was listed as essentially completely
> non-relocatable (!).  i didn't do this for the codegrok package, which is
> now in the public archive, 3.23.49-1.  does anybody remember why it was
> listed non-relocatable (e.g., does the --basedir flag to mysqld not work
> as expected?).
> 
> -- p
> 
> "The content industry controls everything, but ha!, we, the great hackers
> & crackers, will break everything they come up with, and then we will
> distribute it for free! But if they ask nicely, we will still send the
> artists a check, or something."
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Wigwam-devel mailing list
> Wig...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wigwam-devel
>