From: Brian W. <th...@gm...> - 2015-06-02 15:12:01
|
Nope, not on our mind. A lack of access is the primary problem, followed closely by a lack of time and a lack of demand. There isn't anything fancy or gcc-specific in the code though. It does compile with clang (without thread support, but that's clang's fault). Mucking with c_make.as might be all that is needed. To start, try copying the 'Darwin' section, and changing the OSTYPE test to whatever 'uname' reports, and the compiler to icc. Icc will probably complain about ARCH_CFLAGS, so might as well get rid of all of those. -O (optimize) is pretty generic. b On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 9:41 AM, Elton Vasconcelos <elt...@iq...> wrote: > Hello folks, > > I wonder whether it is on CA developers mind to generate a wgs-assembler > version that is compatible with IBM compilers, so we could run it on BG/P > and/or BG/Q supercomputers at Rice University. > I am trying to pre-assemble my target genome sequenced by PacBio > technology. By my calculations, I am gonna need 800 CPUs to run it in 30 > days. > > Thanks in advance for your attention, > Cheers, > Elton > > -- > Elton Vasconcelos, DVM, PhD > Post-doc at Verjovski-Almeida Lab > Department of Biochemistry - Institute of Chemistry > University of Sao Paulo, Brazil > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > wgs-assembler-users mailing list > wgs...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wgs-assembler-users > > |