webwork-user

[Webwork-user] WW integration

[<ma...@sm...>]

WW is now integrated with Open Symphony. Please take a
moment to sign up for the appropriate mailing list (see
below). I'm currently in the process of migrating our
documentation to HTML. I hope to have this done by
week's end. I'm only trying to duplicate what we have
with a few revisions. Later, we can take a look at
inadequecies.

All webwork related questions should be sent here:
ope...@li...

Developers should also sign up for:
ope...@li...

-Matt

Re: [Webwork-user] WW integration

[Toby H. <tob...@in...>]

Is there no separate ww development list? Is there a large volume of
development mail on the os-developer list? Or should ww development just go
to the os-ww list?



> WW is now integrated with Open Symphony. Please take a
> moment to sign up for the appropriate mailing list (see
> below). I'm currently in the process of migrating our
> documentation to HTML. I hope to have this done by
> week's end. I'm only trying to duplicate what we have
> with a few revisions. Later, we can take a look at
> inadequecies.
>
> All webwork related questions should be sent here:
> ope...@li...
>
> Developers should also sign up for:
> ope...@li...
>
> -Matt
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> Welcome to geek heaven.
> http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> _______________________________________________
> Webwork-user mailing list
> Web...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webwork-user

Re: [Webwork-devel] Re: [Webwork-user] WW integration

[Matt B. <ma...@sm...>]

os-ww list for all WW related stuff

----- Original Message -----
From: "Toby Hede" <tob...@in...>
To: <web...@li...>;
<web...@li...>
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 7:26 PM
Subject: [Webwork-devel] Re: [Webwork-user] WW integration


> Is there no separate ww development list? Is there a large volume of
> development mail on the os-developer list? Or should ww development just
go
> to the os-ww list?
>
>
>
> > WW is now integrated with Open Symphony. Please take a
> > moment to sign up for the appropriate mailing list (see
> > below). I'm currently in the process of migrating our
> > documentation to HTML. I hope to have this done by
> > week's end. I'm only trying to duplicate what we have
> > with a few revisions. Later, we can take a look at
> > inadequecies.
> >
> > All webwork related questions should be sent here:
> > ope...@li...
> >
> > Developers should also sign up for:
> > ope...@li...
> >
> > -Matt
> >
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------
> > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> > Welcome to geek heaven.
> > http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> > _______________________________________________
> > Webwork-user mailing list
> > Web...@li...
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webwork-user
>
>
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> Welcome to geek heaven.
> http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> _______________________________________________
> Webwork-devel mailing list
> Web...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webwork-devel
>
>

Re: [Webwork-devel] Re: [Webwork-user] WW integration

[Mike Cannon-B. <mi...@at...>]

IMHO it should all just go to the os-ww list - and if it's too much, we can
think about splitting it.

Looking back at the archives for the past few weeks (I have both ww-devel
and ww-user filtered into the same folder) - there's rarely more than 5
messages a day to _both_ lists (and often cross posted!) :)

My $0.02 - IMHO we see how it goes, and we can add another list later.

-mike

On 18/7/02 10:26 AM, "Toby Hede" (tob...@in...) penned the
words:

> Is there no separate ww development list? Is there a large volume of
> development mail on the os-developer list? Or should ww development just go
> to the os-ww list?
> 
> 
> 
>> WW is now integrated with Open Symphony. Please take a
>> moment to sign up for the appropriate mailing list (see
>> below). I'm currently in the process of migrating our
>> documentation to HTML. I hope to have this done by
>> week's end. I'm only trying to duplicate what we have
>> with a few revisions. Later, we can take a look at
>> inadequecies.
>> 
>> All webwork related questions should be sent here:
>> ope...@li...
>> 
>> Developers should also sign up for:
>> ope...@li...
>> 
>> -Matt
>> 
>> 
>> -------------------------------------------------------
>> This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
>> Welcome to geek heaven.
>> http://thinkgeek.com/sf
>> _______________________________________________
>> Webwork-user mailing list
>> Web...@li...
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webwork-user
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> Welcome to geek heaven.
> http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> _______________________________________________
> Webwork-devel mailing list
> Web...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webwork-devel

Re: [Webwork-devel] Re: [Webwork-user] WW integration

[Rickard <ri...@dr...>]

Mike Cannon-Brookes wrote:
> IMHO it should all just go to the os-ww list - and if it's too much, we=
 can
> think about splitting it.
>=20
> Looking back at the archives for the past few weeks (I have both ww-dev=
el
> and ww-user filtered into the same folder) - there's rarely more than 5
> messages a day to _both_ lists (and often cross posted!) :)
>=20
> My $0.02 - IMHO we see how it goes, and we can add another list later.

I'd agree with the above. Keep it one for now, for both user and dev.

/Rickard

--=20
Rickard =D6berg