webwork-user

[Webwork-user] Session (Map) contents.

[Ryan L. <rm...@lo...>]

Hello,


    I'm curious... do the objects that are stored in the
session object within an action required to implement the
java.io.Serializable interface? I know that objects placed
in HttpSession must be, but it appears that WebWork presents
the programmer with just a plain Map. Do the rules still
apply?

Thanks,

Ryan LeCompte
rm...@lo...
http://www.louisiana.edu/~rml7669

Re: [Webwork-user] Session (Map) contents.

[Toby H. <tob...@in...>]

The rules will still apply.

I might be way off here, but it is my understanding that implementing the
SessionAware interface simply allows the ActionContext to pass in the
HTTPSession Map for access.

See action.factory.SessionMap, action.factory.ActionFactory


>
> Hello,
>
>
>    I'm curious... do the objects that are stored in the
> session object within an action required to implement the
> java.io.Serializable interface? I know that objects placed
> in HttpSession must be, but it appears that WebWork presents
> the programmer with just a plain Map. Do the rules still
> apply?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ryan LeCompte
> rm...@lo...
> http://www.louisiana.edu/~rml7669
>
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> Stuff, things, and much much more.
> http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> _______________________________________________
> Webwork-user mailing list
> Web...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webwork-user

Re: [Webwork-user] Session (Map) contents.

[Rickard <ri...@dr...>]

Toby Hede wrote:
> The rules will still apply.
>=20
> I might be way off here, but it is my understanding that implementing t=
he
> SessionAware interface simply allows the ActionContext to pass in the
> HTTPSession Map for access.

That is precisely correct.

/Rickard

--=20
Rickard =D6berg

Re: [Webwork-user] Session (Map) contents.

[Matt B. <ma...@sm...>]

Yes because WW is providing a wrapper around HTTP Session.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Ryan LeCompte" <rm...@lo...>
To: <web...@li...>
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 6:39 PM
Subject: [Webwork-user] Session (Map) contents.


> 
> Hello,
> 
> 
>     I'm curious... do the objects that are stored in the
> session object within an action required to implement the
> java.io.Serializable interface? I know that objects placed
> in HttpSession must be, but it appears that WebWork presents
> the programmer with just a plain Map. Do the rules still
> apply?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Ryan LeCompte
> rm...@lo...
> http://www.louisiana.edu/~rml7669
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> Stuff, things, and much much more.
> http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> _______________________________________________
> Webwork-user mailing list
> Web...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webwork-user
> 
>