Thread: [Webwork-devel] WW integration
Brought to you by:
baldree,
rickardoberg
Menu
▾
▴
webwork-devel
|
From: <ma...@sm...> - 2002-07-16 18:54:26
|
I'm starting the migration of WW to OS. This is a work in progress but here are my tasks. I hope to have these tasks completed by week's end. 1. Updating OS site to include WW. 2. Migrating WW docs to HTML. 3. Update OS website to build WW docs. 4. Import WW code into OS. (I will announce this to the WW developer list before I do this.) 5. Add WW core developers to OS. 6. Add WW mailing list to OS. 7. Announce migration and shut down WW SF site. This means appropriate modules will be turned off and project description will direct users to OS. -Matt |
|
From: <ma...@sm...> - 2002-07-17 18:37:40
|
WW is now integrated with Open Symphony. Please take a moment to sign up for the appropriate mailing list (see below). I'm currently in the process of migrating our documentation to HTML. I hope to have this done by week's end. I'm only trying to duplicate what we have with a few revisions. Later, we can take a look at inadequecies. All webwork related questions should be sent here: ope...@li... Developers should also sign up for: ope...@li... -Matt |
|
From: Toby H. <tob...@in...> - 2002-07-18 00:26:06
|
Is there no separate ww development list? Is there a large volume of development mail on the os-developer list? Or should ww development just go to the os-ww list? > WW is now integrated with Open Symphony. Please take a > moment to sign up for the appropriate mailing list (see > below). I'm currently in the process of migrating our > documentation to HTML. I hope to have this done by > week's end. I'm only trying to duplicate what we have > with a few revisions. Later, we can take a look at > inadequecies. > > All webwork related questions should be sent here: > ope...@li... > > Developers should also sign up for: > ope...@li... > > -Matt > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Welcome to geek heaven. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > _______________________________________________ > Webwork-user mailing list > Web...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webwork-user |
|
From: Matt B. <ma...@sm...> - 2002-07-18 00:41:19
|
os-ww list for all WW related stuff ----- Original Message ----- From: "Toby Hede" <tob...@in...> To: <web...@li...>; <web...@li...> Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 7:26 PM Subject: [Webwork-devel] Re: [Webwork-user] WW integration > Is there no separate ww development list? Is there a large volume of > development mail on the os-developer list? Or should ww development just go > to the os-ww list? > > > > > WW is now integrated with Open Symphony. Please take a > > moment to sign up for the appropriate mailing list (see > > below). I'm currently in the process of migrating our > > documentation to HTML. I hope to have this done by > > week's end. I'm only trying to duplicate what we have > > with a few revisions. Later, we can take a look at > > inadequecies. > > > > All webwork related questions should be sent here: > > ope...@li... > > > > Developers should also sign up for: > > ope...@li... > > > > -Matt > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > > Welcome to geek heaven. > > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > > _______________________________________________ > > Webwork-user mailing list > > Web...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webwork-user > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Welcome to geek heaven. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > _______________________________________________ > Webwork-devel mailing list > Web...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webwork-devel > > |
|
From: Joseph O. <jo...@en...> - 2002-07-16 18:56:56
|
We need to make sure to let SF support know to move the webwork modules across directly, when the time comes, so we don't lose version information. This is step 4; I figured we were already aware of the issues, but wanted to make sure. :) --------------------------------------------------------- Joseph B. Ottinger jo...@en... http://enigmastation.com IT Consultant On Tue, 16 Jul 2002 ma...@sm... wrote: > I'm starting the migration of WW to OS. This is a work > in progress but here are my tasks. I hope to have these > tasks completed by week's end. > > 1. Updating OS site to include WW. > 2. Migrating WW docs to HTML. > 3. Update OS website to build WW docs. > 4. Import WW code into OS. (I will announce this to the > WW developer list before I do this.) > 5. Add WW core developers to OS. > 6. Add WW mailing list to OS. > 7. Announce migration and shut down WW SF site. This > means appropriate modules will be turned off and > project description will direct users to OS. > > -Matt > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by: Jabber - The world's fastest growing > real-time communications platform! Don't just IM. Build it in! > http://www.jabber.com/osdn/xim > _______________________________________________ > Opensymphony-developers mailing list > Ope...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-developers > |
|
From: Mike Cannon-B. <mi...@at...> - 2002-07-17 00:51:23
|
Matt, That looks fantastic - I just checked the website and the doco frontpage is up - looks good. I'll migrate the WW JIRA data across this week too - I have to work out how to do it :) 3. Is the plan to move WW docs away from using DocBook to plain HTML? 4. Agree with JoeO here - ask SF to do the migration so we keep change history. 5. Let me know the SF names of who you want added! 6. Right - opensymphony-webwork sound ok? 7. Can we shut down a SF site? :) Cheers, Mike PS I'm also investigating setting up MovableType (www.movabletype.org) as a news system for OS and for any developer who wants a blog (blogs.opensymphony.com?). That way each different module can have independent news on their module pages, and also the frontpage can have an aggregate of news. This would make the website more dynamic. Will let you know about progress. On 17/7/02 4:54 AM, "ma...@sm..." (ma...@sm...) penned the words: > I'm starting the migration of WW to OS. This is a work > in progress but here are my tasks. I hope to have these > tasks completed by week's end. > > 1. Updating OS site to include WW. > 2. Migrating WW docs to HTML. > 3. Update OS website to build WW docs. > 4. Import WW code into OS. (I will announce this to the > WW developer list before I do this.) > 5. Add WW core developers to OS. > 6. Add WW mailing list to OS. > 7. Announce migration and shut down WW SF site. This > means appropriate modules will be turned off and > project description will direct users to OS. > > -Matt > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by: Jabber - The world's fastest growing > real-time communications platform! Don't just IM. Build it in! > http://www.jabber.com/osdn/xim > _______________________________________________ > Opensymphony-developers mailing list > Ope...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-developers |
|
From: Matt B. <ma...@sm...> - 2002-07-17 01:00:21
|
----- Original Message ----- From: "Mike Cannon-Brookes" <mi...@at...> To: <ma...@sm...>; <web...@li...>; "opensymphony-developers" <ope...@li...> Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 7:51 PM Subject: Re: [Opensymphony-developers] WW integration > Matt, > > That looks fantastic - I just checked the website and the doco frontpage is > up - looks good. > > I'll migrate the WW JIRA data across this week too - I have to work out how > to do it :) > > 3. Is the plan to move WW docs away from using DocBook to plain HTML? yes, it is in the works. > > 4. Agree with JoeO here - ask SF to do the migration so we keep change > history. > done, they are on it. > 5. Let me know the SF names of who you want added! > jhaynie - VXML owner rickardoberg mauricevineyard llucifer - XSLT owner [If I missed anybody who thinks they should be added, please *yell*.] > 6. Right - opensymphony-webwork sound ok? > sounds fine. > 7. Can we shut down a SF site? :) > maybe > Cheers, > Mike > > PS I'm also investigating setting up MovableType (www.movabletype.org) as a > news system for OS and for any developer who wants a blog > (blogs.opensymphony.com?). That way each different module can have > independent news on their module pages, and also the frontpage can have an > aggregate of news. This would make the website more dynamic. Will let you > know about progress. > > On 17/7/02 4:54 AM, "ma...@sm..." (ma...@sm...) penned the > words: > > > I'm starting the migration of WW to OS. This is a work > > in progress but here are my tasks. I hope to have these > > tasks completed by week's end. > > > > 1. Updating OS site to include WW. > > 2. Migrating WW docs to HTML. > > 3. Update OS website to build WW docs. > > 4. Import WW code into OS. (I will announce this to the > > WW developer list before I do this.) > > 5. Add WW core developers to OS. > > 6. Add WW mailing list to OS. > > 7. Announce migration and shut down WW SF site. This > > means appropriate modules will be turned off and > > project description will direct users to OS. > > > > -Matt > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > This sf.net email is sponsored by: Jabber - The world's fastest growing > > real-time communications platform! Don't just IM. Build it in! > > http://www.jabber.com/osdn/xim > > _______________________________________________ > > Opensymphony-developers mailing list > > Ope...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-developers > > > |
|
From: Mike Cannon-B. <mi...@at...> - 2002-07-17 01:29:53
|
>> 3. Is the plan to move WW docs away from using DocBook to plain HTML? > > yes, it is in the works. Great! >> 5. Let me know the SF names of who you want added! >> > > jhaynie - VXML owner > rickardoberg > mauricevineyard > llucifer - XSLT owner Done - welcome all! >> 6. Right - opensymphony-webwork sound ok? >> > > sounds fine. Done - should be live in 6-24 hours. Cheers, Mike |
|
From: Bill B. <bi...@pr...> - 2002-07-17 22:00:48
|
Hello, Matt Baldree wrote: > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Mike Cannon-Brookes" <mi...@at...> > To: <ma...@sm...>; <web...@li...>; > "opensymphony-developers" <ope...@li...> > Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 7:51 PM > Subject: Re: [Opensymphony-developers] WW integration > > > 3. Is the plan to move WW docs away from using DocBook to plain HTML? > > yes, it is in the works. So, no more XML to HTML transformation of any kind? Care to provide any details? -Bill |
×
Want the latest updates on software, tech news, and AI?
Get latest updates about software, tech news, and AI from SourceForge directly in your inbox once a month.
Thanks for helping keep SourceForge clean.
X