webwork-devel

[Webwork-devel] webwork.config.XMLActionConfiguration patch

[Markus H. <ma...@ac...>]

On a sidenote, I would prefer to have the CVS commit logs mailed to a
separate list (webwork-cvs maybe?). They are definitely useful for
tracking development, but IMHO it would be more convenient to have
them on a separate list.

Regards, Markus.

-- 
Markus Holmberg
ma...@ac...

Re: [Webwork-devel] webwork.config.XMLActionConfiguration patch

[Rickard <ri...@xp...>]

Markus Holmberg wrote:

> As far as I can understand, the current XMLActionConfiguration only
> adds command aliases to the mappings if the command alias has child
> views.
> 
> Isn't the intention that the command aliases should be added
> regardless of the existence of child views?
> 
> I have attached a patch to remedy this, assuming it is something that
> should be remedied.


Fixed, although I added that the alias had to be defined in the first 
place in order to be added to the mappings.


> On a sidenote, I would prefer to have the CVS commit logs mailed to a
> separate list (webwork-cvs maybe?). They are definitely useful for
> tracking development, but IMHO it would be more convenient to have
> them on a separate list.

Well, you can't name a list webwork-cvs (SourceForge limitation, 
webwork-cvs-list would work), but other than that, I prefer to have it 
to dev since then you know that all developers will see the messages. No 
complaining about "I didn't see that change!". Why would it be more 
convenient to have a separate list?

/Rickard

-- 
Rickard Öberg

Re: [Webwork-devel] webwork.config.XMLActionConfiguration patch

[Markus H. <ma...@ac...>]

On Tue, Nov 27, 2001 at 04:28:46PM +0100, Rickard =D6berg wrote:
> Well, you can't name a list webwork-cvs (SourceForge limitation,=20
> webwork-cvs-list would work), but other than that, I prefer to have it=20
> to dev since then you know that all developers will see the messages. N=
o=20
> complaining about "I didn't see that change!". Why would it be more=20
> convenient to have a separate list?

The intentions are all good, I got no problem with that.

My motivation is that I'd like to separate mail traffic that is
automatically generated and can come in larger volumes (cvs commit logs)
and human generated mail. (Although I find the cvs commit log messages
useful, I have a low interest in them compared to human generated message=
s
and hence would like to separate them).

But this is not a big issue for me. I can always do this locally with
procmail.

Markus

--=20

Markus Holmberg
ma...@ac...

Re: [Webwork-devel] webwork.config.XMLActionConfiguration patch

[Rickard <ri...@xp...>]

Markus Holmberg wrote:

> On Tue, Nov 27, 2001 at 04:28:46PM +0100, Rickard Öberg wrote:
> 
>>Well, you can't name a list webwork-cvs (SourceForge limitation, 
>>webwork-cvs-list would work), but other than that, I prefer to have it 
>>to dev since then you know that all developers will see the messages. No 
>>complaining about "I didn't see that change!". Why would it be more 
>>convenient to have a separate list?
>>
> 
> The intentions are all good, I got no problem with that.
> 
> My motivation is that I'd like to separate mail traffic that is
> automatically generated and can come in larger volumes (cvs commit logs)
> and human generated mail. (Although I find the cvs commit log messages
> useful, I have a low interest in them compared to human generated messages
> and hence would like to separate them).


I use a mail filter in my email program to deal with this. It sounds 
like you want them to separate mail boxes, correct? Otherwise there 
would be no difference.

/Rickard


-- 
Rickard Öberg

Re: [Webwork-devel] webwork.config.XMLActionConfiguration patch

[Markus H. <ma...@ac...>]

On Tue, Nov 27, 2001 at 08:43:50PM +0100, Rickard =D6berg wrote:
> I use a mail filter in my email program to deal with this. It sounds=20
> like you want them to separate mail boxes, correct? Otherwise there=20
> would be no difference.

Yes, separate mailboxes was what I meant. I filter the mail locally
now. Just wanted to hear if anyone else thought a split would be good.

Markus

--=20

Markus Holmberg
ma...@ac...