Re: [Webwork-devel] Re: [Webwork-user] WW integration

[Mike Cannon-B. <mi...@at...>]

IMHO it should all just go to the os-ww list - and if it's too much, we can
think about splitting it.

Looking back at the archives for the past few weeks (I have both ww-devel
and ww-user filtered into the same folder) - there's rarely more than 5
messages a day to _both_ lists (and often cross posted!) :)

My $0.02 - IMHO we see how it goes, and we can add another list later.

-mike

On 18/7/02 10:26 AM, "Toby Hede" (tob...@in...) penned the
words:

> Is there no separate ww development list? Is there a large volume of
> development mail on the os-developer list? Or should ww development just go
> to the os-ww list?
> 
> 
> 
>> WW is now integrated with Open Symphony. Please take a
>> moment to sign up for the appropriate mailing list (see
>> below). I'm currently in the process of migrating our
>> documentation to HTML. I hope to have this done by
>> week's end. I'm only trying to duplicate what we have
>> with a few revisions. Later, we can take a look at
>> inadequecies.
>> 
>> All webwork related questions should be sent here:
>> ope...@li...
>> 
>> Developers should also sign up for:
>> ope...@li...
>> 
>> -Matt
>> 
>> 
>> -------------------------------------------------------
>> This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
>> Welcome to geek heaven.
>> http://thinkgeek.com/sf
>> _______________________________________________
>> Webwork-user mailing list
>> Web...@li...
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webwork-user
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> Welcome to geek heaven.
> http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> _______________________________________________
> Webwork-devel mailing list
> Web...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webwork-devel