Re: [Webwork-user] Why I like WebWork

[Rickard <ri...@dr...>]

Matt Baldree wrote:
>>4) I needed the system as a whole to be proxy-based in order to do
>>memorymanagement with object caches. Since AspectJ works on regular
>>classes that wouldn't work (AFAIK).
>=20
> You can advise objects as well.

Hm.. not sure what this has to do with my 4 point. What I meant was that=20
I really needed the proxy/object separation, as in EJB, in order to do=20
memory management. I *don't* want my entire object graph to be in memory=20
all the time.

> Ok, I'm sure it makes sense for your project. But, I think that AspectJ=
 will
> become the defacto standard in the future.

That is quite probable, sure. But I think there's enough room for more=20
implementations than just AspectJ.

/Rickard

--=20
Rickard =D6berg