Re: [Webwork-user] OT: AOP toolkit, was Why I like WebWork

[Rickard <ri...@dr...>]

Roger Holbrook wrote:
> I can well understand wanting to test it in you own stuff first - do yo=
u=20
> have any feel for the time scales involved? =20

Probably somewhere in October/November.

> If these are long, is there=20
> anything you would consider making a snapshot of, as you did for the=20
> 'first go'?  I don't wish to sound impatient - I'm just fascinated by=20
> this bit of code!  I happened to bump into the 'first go' soon after I=20
> worked out the Proxy class was 'interesting' - I just hadn't understood=
=20
> quite 'how interesting' it might be :-)

I'll have to check with the others.

> Also off topic, but this time with regard to the content management=20
> system - are you pursuing the JDO / RDF scheme you outlined previously?=
=20

No, we'll be using plain serialisation for the storing, since we have=20
almost no needs at all for queries. The content is just one big tree of=20
objects. It wouldn't be difficult to add a JDO or RDF persistence=20
manager to it however, but right now I don't see what we'd gain from it.=20
We'll see.

> If this is your main product, then presumably you won't be opensourcing=
=20
> this code?=20

Nope, this is actually my first purely closed source project :-) Feels=20
strange really. We might do a developer source license though, or at=20
least an open API for plugins.

/Rickard

--=20
Rickard =D6berg