RE: [Webwork-user] Re: [Webwork-devel] Intergrate with OpenSymphony?

[Jason C. <jas...@no...>]

+1, since it doesn't have to change anything

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joe Walnes [mailto:jo...@tr...]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 7:41 AM
> To: web...@li...;
> ope...@li...
> Subject: [Webwork-user] Re: [Webwork-devel] Intergrate with
> OpenSymphony?
>=20
>=20
> As someone from the OpenSymphony camp and a very big fan of=20
> WebWork, you=20
> get my +1.
>=20
> Though I would like to point out that if WW is under the same=20
> umbrella as=20
> the other OSym tools it does not mean you have to start using=20
> them (or=20
> vice-versa).
>=20
> Oh yeah, please don't impose the com.opensymphony package=20
> namespace on=20
> WebWork (or in fact any rules)!
>=20
> Cheers,
> -Joe Walnes
>=20
> On Mon, 01 July 2002, ma...@sm... wrote
>  > Ok. It's time to bring up a former heated subject. Back
>  > in March, there was a topic concerning moving WW under
>  > Opensymphony. The conclusion of the debate was just to
>  > hang out and wait. Since then, a lot has changed and I
>  > think it is time to bring this subject up again. I
>  > think WW could benefit from the exposure, common
>  > infrastructure, developers, etc.
>  >
>  > So, I'll start off and say +1. What do you say?=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> Welcome to geek heaven.
> http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> _______________________________________________
> Webwork-user mailing list
> Web...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webwork-user
>=20