[Webwork-user] Re: [Opensymphony-developers] Re: [Webwork-devel]

[<pa...@pa...>]

Yeah! +1 from me too. I'm currently investigating Webwork for a new project (I used Struts before).

Mathias

------------------------
 Joe Walnes <jo...@tr...> wrote:
------------------------
As someone from the OpenSymphony camp and a very big fan of WebWork, you 
>get my +1.
>
>Though I would like to point out that if WW is under the same umbrella as 
>the other OSym tools it does not mean you have to start using them (or 
>vice-versa).
>
>Oh yeah, please don't impose the com.opensymphony package namespace on 
>WebWork (or in fact any rules)!
>
>Cheers,
>-Joe Walnes
>
>On Mon, 01 July 2002, ma...@sm... wrote
> > Ok. It's time to bring up a former heated subject. Back
> > in March, there was a topic concerning moving WW under
> > Opensymphony. The conclusion of the debate was just to
> > hang out and wait. Since then, a lot has changed and I
> > think it is time to bring this subject up again. I
> > think WW could benefit from the exposure, common
> > infrastructure, developers, etc.
> >
> > So, I'll start off and say +1. What do you say? 
>
>
>
>-------------------------------------------------------
>This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
>Welcome to geek heaven.
>http://thinkgeek.com/sf
>_______________________________________________
>Opensymphony-developers mailing list
>Ope...@li...
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-developers