Re: [Webwork-user] WebWork vs. Other Frameworks
Brought to you by:
baldree,
rickardoberg
From: <ma...@sm...> - 2002-06-13 19:44:42
|
Obviously this could be a heated debate on TSS but that aside here are some points to start the discussion. I'll let others add/delete/edit from mine. - WW provides provides custom tags in the form of themes. Struts does not provides this. Anotherwords, you can create your own set of dynamic custom ui tags easily; i.e., voice xml, xhtml, wml, etc. Another point is that the rendering of these tags is abstracted nicely. - WW will provide action chaining which struts doesn't at this time. - WW provides native support for multi-part support. Struts provides custom action for this. WW wraps the request so it behaves as a normal HTTP request. - WW provides a robust expression language to easily fetch data. BTW, the new JSTL will provide a similar capability. Hmm, where did they get this idea? - WW does support i18n. - WW will cast your parameter to the appropriate type for you. struts does not do this. it only supports strings. - WW supports multiple view technologies such as XSLT, Velocity, JSP, Applet, and soon more. I don't know of any other MVC-like frameworks that support this. - WW is aimed at providing part of the web tier solution. For instance, many people use it with OSCache, Sitemesh, and other complimentary frameworks. - We haven't profiled WW yet. This needs to be done. - We still have lots to do but I think we have a solid start. Check it out and tell us what you think. -Matt On Thu, 13 June 2002, Steven Haines wrote > > Hi, > > I need to develop a J2EE application using an MVC > architecture. In the past I have just developed > frameworks similar to the J2EE Blue Prints, but it is > cumbersome and takes time to develop (although it > performs very well from a scalability and memory usage > perspective). > > I also need the ability to internationalize my > application. > > I have briefly looked at WebWork and Struts but wanted > to find out from the field what you believe the > benefits are to using WebWork. Also, what portion of > my architecture does WebWork provide? Just the web > portion or does it provide the framework for the EJB > backend as well (a mechanism for forwarding business > events to to middleware)? > > I have followed Rickard's accomplishments over the > past few years (through JBoss and theserverside.com) > and I am betting this is the framework for me. > > Thanks in advance. > Steven Haines > > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Yahoo! - Official partner of 2002 FIFA World Cup > http://fifaworldcup.yahoo.com > > _______________________________________________________________ > > Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference > August 25-28 in Las Vegas - http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm?source=osdntextlink > > _______________________________________________ > Webwork-user mailing list > Web...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webwork-user |