Re: [Webwork-user] Executing multiple actions with only one request
Brought to you by:
baldree,
rickardoberg
From: Matt B. <ma...@sm...> - 2002-06-06 12:57:16
|
Need to get this scenario recorded. Aapo, will you add a comment? http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/webwork/secure/ViewIssue.jspa?id=10 000 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jason Carreira" <jas...@no...> To: <web...@li...> Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 7:45 AM Subject: RE: [Webwork-user] Executing multiple actions with only one request Here's an example of where action chaining would be useful > -----Original Message----- > From: Aapo Laakkonen [mailto:aap...@pr...] > Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 8:14 PM > To: web...@li... > Subject: [Webwork-user] Executing multiple actions with only > one request > > > Is there some way to execute multiple actions with only one request? > Here is my views.properties file as an example (to show you what I'm > trying to do): > > guestbook.action=guestbook.Guestbook > guestbook.success=guestbook/default.vm > guestbook.sign.action=guestbook.Guestbook!sign > guestbook.sign.success=guestbook.action > > So the flow goes something like this: > > User signs guestbook: > > <form action="guestbook.sign.action"> > ... > </form> > > CommandDriven Guestbook action's doSign() method gets called. When it > has done the work... let's execute guestbook.action, that is mapped to > guestbook.Guestbook (the same) class, but now the default doExecute() > method get's called (that retrieves guestbook entries). After this the > guestbook/default.vm file is displayed to the user. > > The problem is that it doesn't seem to work as WebWork tries to find a > view when doSign()-method returns. It looks for /guestbook.action view > that does not exists. > > I can propably use one of these: > > 1. use WebWork standard redirect action > - needs client side redirection > + URL gets updated and refreshing browser > does not do anything weird (or re-post) > > 2. use #action and #execute velocity macros > - ties velocity template to an action > - I don't like the idea that client needs > to know where to get the information, it > should only know what information exists > and use that > + solves the problem > > 3. call doExecute() method from doSign() method > - For me it is not elegant to call some method from > totally unrelated method only to get valuestack > populated > - Makes refactoring harder as it ties different parts > of software together > + 1 line of code > > So I'm requesting somekind of forwarding mechanism. Maybe > something that > is just like the standard redirect action, but does the work on server > side. > > Or have I missed or misunderstood something in WebWork... does it > already have this mechanism implemented? > > Kind Regards > Aapo Laakkonen > > > > _______________________________________________________________ > > Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference > August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm > > _______________________________________________ > Webwork-user mailing list > Web...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webwork-user > _______________________________________________________________ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm _______________________________________________ Webwork-user mailing list Web...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webwork-user |