RE: [Webwork-devel] OS or JBOSS: decision time

[Kjetil P. <kje...@mo...>]

I admit that we belong more at OS than JBoss - however, JBoss has more =
traffic, thats the only reason.=20

How about this - we go for OS integration, as soon as they have cleaned =
up their site and thrown away the useless stuff, after that we join in =
effort to promote all the good stuff in the major magazines and =
websites.
Then, when we start our portal project, which will probably include many =
of the OS components, we can start talking to JBoss and see if they will =
use our 'product' etc. Then we'll get the best of both...

How does this sound?

/kjetilhp

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rickard [mailto:ri...@mi...]
> Sent: 4. april 2002 10:04
> To: web...@li...
> Subject: [Webwork-devel] OS or JBOSS: decision time
>=20
>=20
> I think we have beat this horse to death enough now. Let's decide.
>=20
> The argument is, basically, as follows:
>  From a technical point of view OS makes sense.
>  From a marketing point of view JBoss makes sense. However, there are=20
> some serious pitfalls, with regard to server portability issues.
>=20
> That is, basically, it. AFAICT.
>=20
>  From a personal integrity point of view I would rank the=20
> technical side=20
> as being more important. Marketing is, well, people will do=20
> what people=20
> will do, and having a strong technical side will lead to better=20
> marketing possibilities in the end. So, my conclusion would be to go=20
> with OS.
>=20
> IIRC Kjetil and Matt are the only ones who wanted to go with=20
> JBoss. Are=20
> there any points besides marketing that led you to that opinion?
>=20
> /Rickard
>=20
> --=20
> Rickard =D6berg
>=20
>=20
>=20
> _______________________________________________
> Webwork-devel mailing list
> Web...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webwork-devel
>=20