Re: [Webwork-devel] WW/JavaOne get together
Brought to you by:
baldree,
rickardoberg
From: Rickard <ri...@mi...> - 2002-04-03 22:07:01
|
Chris Miller wrote: > The only way to avoid that confusion is to create a > *new* brandname that is an umbrella for JBoss and WW, or alternatively = go to > the trouble of truly establishing JBoss as an umbrella brand, that cont= ains > JBoss Application Server, WW etc. I doubt that will happen. > But what's the point, when there already exists such a beast going by t= he > name of OpenSymphony? What's the point of a Ford when there are Volkswagens? I see where=20 you're going with that point, for sure, but it can be argued the other=20 way round too. Otherwise we would be stuck in the "so why make another=20 framework when we have Struts?" argument still. > As several people have pointed out in this thread, OpenSymphony is a pe= rfect > match for WW. OSUser, Sitemesh et al compliment WW very nicely indeed - > surely that cannot be denied?=20 You are absolutely correct, and I don't think anyone has said otherwise=20 either. > OpenSymphony's 'umbrella' struture parallels > Jakarta which will help ease the transition for new users. There have b= een > several other fairly compelling reasons mentioned on this list, all of = which > to me make the move seem very sensible indeed. The main reason against OpenSymphony (that I can think of) is the high=20 quality differences between the projects. Some are outstanding and some=20 are, well, on the other side of the scale. > I fear my voice is wasted, since, as was pointed out in the not too dis= tant > past, we're not dealing with a democracy here. That I can even understa= nd > and live with, as long as the decision makers make decisions based on l= ogic > rather than desires. I hear you. Good points, and thanks for your input. This is a tough decision, and which is important for the overall=20 direction of WW. I would appreciate if more input as Chris just provided=20 was being put forth. Democracy no, but certainly no dictatorship either=20 (in the strictest sense of the word anyway). /Rickard --=20 Rickard =D6berg |