RE: [Webwork-devel] WW/JavaOne get together

[Kjetil P. <kje...@mo...>]

Completely agree, this is at opportunity of attention we can't get =
elsewhere.

/kjetilhp


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Matt Baldree [mailto:ma...@sm...]
> Sent: 2. april 2002 03:05
> To: Rickard
> Cc: Webwork-Developer
> Subject: Re: [Webwork-devel] WW/JavaOne get together
>=20
>=20
> I think OS has done a good job and working with them would be=20
> good, but
> throwing in a new opportunity such as JBoss adds a new twist.=20
> For instance,
> Jetty is a separate project that is embedded in JBoss so why not WW? I
> believe JBoss could use a good web tier framework, and I=20
> think its coat
> tails have grown since it won best app server from JavaWorld.=20
> In addition, I
> know Jakarta solicited them to come aboard but Marc set them=20
> straight. So,
> my vote is JBoss. I think WW has the greatest potential to grow under
> JBoss's umbrella.
>=20
> My $0.02
>=20
> -Matt
>=20
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Rickard" <ri...@mi...>
> To: "Matt Baldree" <ma...@sm...>
> Cc: "Webwork-Developer" <web...@li...>
> Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 3:05 AM
> Subject: Re: [Webwork-devel] WW/JavaOne get together
>=20
>=20
> Matt Baldree wrote:
>=20
> > For those of us that missed the get together, would it be=20
> possible for
> > someone to post some highlights?
>=20
> Well, it was a pretty modest gettogether (me, Kjetil, Maurice + 3 from
> OpenSymphony, oh and Cedric from BEA). You were sorely missed Matt!
>=20
> Mostly we just chatted, but we did talk about some about what to do
> next. Supporting Flash as client was pretty high on the list, and from
> what I can tell it should be trivial to do. I'm gonna get some
> HelloWorld examples from Macromedia and convert them to use WW.
>=20
> We also talked some about what would be the best way to go for WW in
> terms of greater exposure. On the one hand OpenSymphony does=20
> make sense
> (as already discussed), but on the other hand joining JBoss=20
> (which I'll
> probably join up with again, now that I quit from TSS) would give us a
> much more even footing with Struts. Because believe it or not, the
> primary question I got last week was "So, who does this relate to
> Struts?". Argh...
>=20
> So, that was pretty much it. Good beer good chat good place. :-)
>=20
> /Rickard
>=20
> --
> Rickard =D6berg
>=20
>=20
> _______________________________________________
> Webwork-devel mailing list
> Web...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webwork-devel
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
> _______________________________________________
> Webwork-devel mailing list
> Web...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webwork-devel
>=20