Re: [Webwork-devel] RE: Refactorings... Again

[Mike Cannon-B. <mi...@at...>]

Here here! 

I don't see why the views even need to be in a separate JAR, I don't mind
the extra 30k that the velocity views give me by having them in the main JAR
- they don't cause any problems if I don't want to use them, but they make
it easier if I do?

My $0.02 - lots of JARs make things confusing.

-mike

On 3/3/02 10:15 AM, "Maurice Parker" (Ma...@Vi...) penned
the words:

> Matt,
> 
> On Friday, March 1, 2002, at 09:15  AM, ma...@sm... wrote:
> 
>> Separating out the views allows incremental releases to support separate
>> views. It is not whether they are causing end user problems. I think the
>> separation is important. People can grap one jar for all view support or
>> an individual jar. This will allow the different views to release
>> independently.
> 
> Where did the perception that we need to release the views separate from
> the Action engine come from?  None of the view technologies have ever held
> up the release.  Just what exactly is the problem that you are trying to
> solve?
> 
> Splitting WebWork into 4 parts is only going to confuse people and make it
> more difficult for them to know which parts are compatible.  Do you think
> we can coordinate 4 separate releases when we can't even get 1.0 out the
> door?
> 
> -Maurice
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Webwork-devel mailing list
> Web...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webwork-devel