RE: [Webwork-devel] RE: Refactorings... Again

[Kjetil P. <kje...@mo...>]

> In my mind I just can't picture what the names mean....=20
> common =3D=3D common to=20
> all components, but core =3D=3D needed by all components ...=20

common are common stuff to webwork :)
like most of the time you would use one or more of these view =
technologies togheter with WW, and also some or all of the classes in =
the other common packages

> So therefore at this=20
> point I can't=20
> really tell you where to put it, all I can say is that all=20
> the configuration=20
> functionallity should be together. either all in common or=20
> all in core.

my reason for putting it common was that XML confiurator uses 3rd party =
xml libraries but I think maybe it should be all in core ..=20

	Matt, what do you say?

>=20
> >And also the property files, we introduced=20
> common.properties, not completly=20
> >sure yet what goes in here from default.props
> >
>=20
> hehe, it's your doing, you figure it out... haha

will do ....


>=20
> .... maybe it's time for me to branch the codebase to another=20
> project, and=20
> go back to basics, after all this is open source, and ww has=20
> a liberal=20
> license.... maybe I'm just getting old... heck, who knows. hehe

up to you.. don't see why these changes would make you do that - the =
functionality is the same it's just layed out in another way

/kjetilhp