[Webwork-devel] RE: Refactorings... Again

[Kjetil P. <kje...@mo...>]

Please don't say that we did not communicate this, I sent numerous mail =
to the dev list for input and suggestion on how to make WebWork core =
more seperated from the view stuff. Can't see that I got any mail from =
either of you that are complaining. The goal of this refactoring is, as =
said, to separate the core and the view, and to factor out most of the =
3rd party libs so that WW deploys smoothly on most containers.

The plan is to have build several JAR archives:
- webwork-core.jar,=20
- webwork-taglib.jar
- webwork-velocity.jar
- webwork-xslt.jar
- webwork-common.jar=20
and webwork-examples.jar,=20

and distribute two WAR archives one with only the common stuff and =
documentation, and one with common + examples.

I've finished the code refactoring now, Matt are going to do extensive =
debugging and testing of the web-tier before releasing so everything =
should be Ok within a few days.=20

I know that this was kind of unpolite and disturbed a lot of people - so =
I appologize. I tried to get input and feedback, not much came. I =
suggested this solution that are finished now to Rickard and he agreed =
so I went ahead, with Matt's help since he volunteered.=20

If there are many of you that step up to the plate and strogly disagree =
with this we can always revert to the structure that was before I =
started. Speak now or hold your silence to the 1.0 is released :)


FYI, I use IntelliJ, I just didn't disconect it from CVS.

/kjetilhp

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Victor Salaman [mailto:vsa...@ho...]
> Sent: Friday, March 01, 2002 8:34 AM
> To: kje...@us...;=20
> web...@li...
> Subject: Refactorings... Again
>=20
>=20
> Dude,
>=20
> Make up your mind where you're going to put things finally.=20
> Do we have some=20
> sort of design document describing the refactoring, or at=20
> least some kind of=20
> beforehand planning? It certainly doesn't look like it. And=20
> since there was=20
> no discussion or concensus about this, it is plainly unpolite.
>=20
> It appears that you're winging it, and package names and=20
> locations are=20
> coming out of the blue...
>=20
> I can't be changing my source every 2 minutes when you decide=20
> that it'll=20
> look preetier somehow else, as it certainly doesn't add any=20
> functionallity=20
> or ease of use to the common user.
>=20
> I do have source that breaks every time you say "Refactor".
>=20
> As a suggestion, I'd also tell you to download IDEA and do=20
> the refactorings=20
> on your PC, and when you're satisfied with the result, then=20
> commit. Having=20
> an unstable CVS tree, and 1 week refactorings are completely=20
> unacceptable.
>=20
> In other words, plan before you commit.
>=20
> I'm speaking for myself, and not anyone else, but I'm sure=20
> other people=20
> concurr with my feelings.
>=20
> Thanks for your time,
>=20
> /V
>=20
> >From: "Kjetil H.Paulsen" <kje...@us...>
> >To: app...@us...,=20
> >ite...@us...,   =20
> >mer...@us...,=20
> >sor...@us...,=20
> >sub...@us...,   =20
> >web...@li...
> >Subject: [Webwork-devel] CVS update:=20
> >webwork/src/main/webwork/common/view/taglib/iterator
> >Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2002 23:15:14 -0800
> >
> >Update of=20
> >/cvsroot/webwork/webwork/src/main/webwork/common/view/taglib/iterator
> >In directory usw-pr-cvs1:/tmp/cvs-serv11976/taglib/iterator
> >
> >Modified Files:
> >	AppendIteratorTag.java IteratorGeneratorTag.java
> >	MergeIteratorTag.java SortIteratorTag.java
> >	SubsetIteratorTag.java
> >Log Message:
> >refactoring
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Webwork-devel mailing list
> >Web...@li...
> >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webwork-devel
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
> _________________________________________________________________
> Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com
>=20