Re: [Webwork-devel] [Fwd: WebWork - OpenSymphony]

[Victor S. <vsa...@ho...>]

Hi Dave:

I have written the following items for Velocity/WebWork:

1. Sitemesh #decorate directive.
2. OScache #cache directive
3. Made a better Webwork/Velocity Servlet

just for your information :) ... it wouldn't be a kill as I don't use JSP 
anymore, but JSP is useful to a lot of people... WebWork is agnostic and a 
lot of OpenSymphony too... It's been designed like that.

Cheers,

/V

>From: Dave Bryson <db...@in...>
>To: Rickard <ri...@mi...>, 
>"web...@li..." <web...@li...>
>Subject: Re: [Webwork-devel] [Fwd: WebWork - OpenSymphony]
>Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 09:33:45 -0600
>
>On Monday 11 February 2002 08:25 am, you wrote:
> > I just got this from OpenSymphony. It's an interesting proposal, but I'd
> > like to hear your input whether you think it's good or not. What are the
> > pro's and con's?
>
>It seems like some of the key components of OpenSymphony ( OSCache and
>Sitemesh ) are slanted towards JSP.  Can these components be used with
>Velocity or would the merge kill Velocity support?
>
>One of the main reasons I moved to WebWork was it's simplicity and
>few dependencies on external libraries.  I fear a merge would evolve 
>towards
>bloat - causing an eventual dependency creep between OpenSymphony and 
>WebWork.
>
>IMO, WebWork is best served by itself.
>
>dave
>--
>Dave Bryson
>
>_______________________________________________
>Webwork-devel mailing list
>Web...@li...
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webwork-devel




_________________________________________________________________
Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com