Re: Re: [Webwork-devel] Branch or Commit , which?

[matt b. <mat...@ho...>]

>From: Jim...@do...
>To: "matt baldree" <mat...@ho...>
>Subject: Re: Re: [Webwork-devel] Branch or Commit , which?
>Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2002 12:40:59 -0500
>
>I would recommend that WebWork core be defined as all classes that are
>invoked prior to the RequestDispatcher.forward() call. This would mean
>that the Velocity servlet dispatcher and the webwork taglibs are
>distributed as an add-on to the core.
>
>I have another post lurking somewhere why I feel this is a good decision.
>Bottom line is, I feel WebWork should be view agnostic, as do most of us.

I agree overall, but I think the best approach for Feb. 15 is just core and 
examples. Later core could be split further.

>Since some (many?) WebWork projects do not rely on JSP, thus no taglibs,
>why tie the development and release of the Action engine (the real core)
>to the release schedule of the JSP taglibs? The real core of WebWork could
>have gone 1.0 about 6 months ago.

Actually, we have been waiting on the docs and nothing more.

>
>$.02,
>-jim


_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp.