From: Geoffrey T. <gta...@na...> - 2004-08-06 22:04:02
|
Matt Feifarek wrote: > Geoffrey Talvola wrote: > >> I think what's needed in the short term is a volunteer to cut a new >> release based on what's already in CVS. That, if I recall >> correctly, was the original request that started all the discussion. >> There have been a few bugfixes on the 0.8 release branch since >> 0.8.1, so cutting a new 0.8.2 release would be beneficial to all. >> >> > Is it easy to tell which bits of CVS are simply bugfixes to 0.8.1 and > which are the "tip"? Yes, they are tagged appropriately using the CVS tagging and branching mechanism. Look on the Release-0_8-Support branch. There are only a very small number of changes on that branch since 0.8.1 but there are a large number of changes between 0.8.1 and the current CVS HEAD. > > If so, a point release could be whipped up pretty quickly, but > otherwise, I don't understand the difference between your 0.8.2 and > 0.9b1 ideas. - Geoff |
From: Matt F. <ma...@da...> - 2004-08-06 22:06:34
|
Cool. I'll check out that branch. Thanks. Geoffrey Talvola wrote: >>Is it easy to tell which bits of CVS are simply bugfixes to 0.8.1 and >>which are the "tip"? >> >> >Yes, they are tagged appropriately using the CVS tagging and branching >mechanism. Look on the Release-0_8-Support branch. There are only a very >small number of changes on that branch since 0.8.1 but there are a large >number of changes between 0.8.1 and the current CVS HEAD. > > |