From: Geoffrey T. <gta...@na...> - 2003-02-04 18:16:15
|
I agree with you -- we should go with option b. - Geoff > -----Original Message----- > From: Stuart Donaldson [mailto:st...@as...] > Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 11:05 AM > To: Webware devel > Subject: [Webware-devel] 0.8 beta status. > > > We have a few options on 0.8 right now, and I wanted to toss > them out to > see if there are strong opinions either way. Any code > changes require > further beta testing, and therefore more time before final > release of 0.8. > > Here are the options I put forward to consider: > > a) Release 0.8 right now, without the mkstemp fix or any recent > patches, but with updates to the version numbers in the > documentation. > > b) Put out 0.8b3 with the mkstemp fix that Geoff checked > in a few days ago. Let this sit out for a couple days > to verify the mkstemp fixes. > > c) Put out 0.8b3 with the mkstemp fix, and a couple of > other minor patches. Let this sit out there for a couple > more days to verify. > > > Geoff had asked if someone could test the mkstemp fixes he applied to > the trunk under Linux. Has anyone had a chance to do this? > > I like the idea of providing compatibility with Python 2.3 > even though > it is only in alpha. But this requires at least a few days as a short > beta cycle. > > My leaning right now is to go with option (b), puting out > 0.8b3 tonight > with only the mkstemp and documentation changes from 0.8b2. > Then over > the weekend, roll the version numbers and release 0.8 unless > there are > problems specific to the 0.8 beta changes. > > Any comments? > > -Stuart Donaldson- > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.NET email is sponsored by: > SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! > http://www.vasoftware.com > _______________________________________________ > Webware-devel mailing list > Web...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webware-devel > |