From: Mark P. <ma...@mo...> - 2004-11-29 23:06:59
|
On Nov 29, 2004, at 12:13 PM, Winston Wolff wrote: > I have used WebUnit very successfully for high level tests. > (http://mechanicalcat.net/tech/webunit) > > I haven't been able to figure out how to unit-test pages since > anything that extends Page requires the AppServer to be running. > Perhaps part of the dependency can be eliminated with a mock > HTTPTransaction, but I'm not sure. > > I think it would be good to organize a working group of people willing > to work on tests. I know several people including myself have > volunteered to work on the release, but not to lead it themselves > citing inexperience. However I have not been "called to service" yet. > A difficulty with volunteering to do a release is to know if I've > made a mistake in the release process. Hence the need for tests. > Once we have a group together, we can pick a few priorities in the > tests, and settle anything needed to let people get to work > individually, such as how our tests will fit into the larger set of > test cases. > > -winston > Thanks for the reply, Winston. I will add your commentary and take a look at WebUnit when I get the chance. I am open to discussing how a "release team" might be organized and operate. Feel free to send me a note off-list if you wish. Mark Phillips Mophilly & Associates On the web at http://www.mophilly.com On the phone at 619 444-9210 |