[Webunitproj-users] RE: xml script for webunit
Brought to you by:
dgan
|
From: <Eri...@al...> - 2003-01-06 16:44:17
|
Franz,
Unfortunately, these are all things we're stuck with,
until someone has the time to address them. See
my comments inline on each issue.
Thanks,
--Erik
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Fra...@sw...=20
> [mailto:Fra...@sw...]
> Sent: Sunday, January 05, 2003 2:08 PM
> To: Ostermueller, Erik
> Subject: RE: xml script for webunit
>=20
>=20
> Hi Erik,=20
>=20
> sorry it took so long for me to reply. We enjoyed=20
> holydays without
> internet.=20
>=20
> > Tell me more about the issues with the unit tests.
> > There is an existing problem that we inherited --
> > it has an easy work-around.
>=20
> When I run 'ant unittest' the following happens:=20
>=20
> The buildfile runs.=20
> A popup appears with an ok button ant the text 'start'.=20
> When I wait a
> timeout occurs and I get an error.
> When I press ok, another popup appears with the test=20
> 'onchange box'. =20
I think it is important that people know that WebUnit does not yet
have support to programmatically dismiss MsgBoxes. I vote that we
leave these in here (in some form) until we have MsgBox support.
>=20
> Then, junit displays A'OK (18 tests)' but hangs since it=20
The 'OK (18 tests)' message is currently how I judge success/failure,
in light of all this other 'noise'.
> appears to wait
> for the jview process
This behaviour really irritates me. I think I've used a
profile tool (like JProbe) to help detect the root of this problem.
ANT might be part of the problem too. I vaguely remember running
this from a batch file and not getting this behavior.
> to terminate.... wich does not. I still see 15 or 16=20
> open 'browser'
> windows which - when I close
> them - want to submit a bug report to Microsoft. =20
>=20
> The only chance to terminate the ant script is to press=20
> 'Ctrl-C' on the
> console (This does not call
> Dr. Watson or whoever this is on XP). =20
>=20
> I am expecting that the 'ant unittest' runs completely=20
> autonomous.=20
I agree that getting the unit tests to run autonomously is a good goal.
We just have more work before we get there.
>=20
>=20
> I have:=20
>=20
> Windows XP Service Pack 1,=20
> Java 1.4.0=20
I get these same behaviors with Win2k, 1.4.1.
>=20
> Cheers,=20
> Franz
>=20
|