Menu
▾
▴
webmacro-devel
|
From: Adam R. B. J. <aj...@tr...> - 2003-10-17 19:13:21
|
Hi all. I see you do not have an e-mail registered w/ Gump in order to get failure notifications. Would you mind if I registered this address [above] for you? Typically a from for such e-mails is a person on the mailing list who develops the product. Any volunteers? http://gump.dotnot.org/webmacro/webmacro.html http://gump.dotnot.org/webmacro/build/build_webmacro_webmacro.html BUILD FAILED /var/gump/webmacro/build.xml:129: Warning: Could not find file /var/gump/webmacro/webmacro.defaults.classic to copy. regards, Adam -- Experience Sybase Technology... http://www.try.sybase.com |
|
From: Eric B. R. <eb...@tc...> - 2003-10-17 19:26:36
|
On Oct 17, 2003, at 12:43 PM, Adam R. B. Jack wrote: > Hi all. > > I see you do not have an e-mail registered w/ Gump in order to get > failure > notifications. Who registered us with Gump, any why? eric > Would you mind if I registered this address [above] for you? > Typically a from for such e-mails is a person on the mailing list who > develops the product. Any volunteers? > > http://gump.dotnot.org/webmacro/webmacro.html > http://gump.dotnot.org/webmacro/build/build_webmacro_webmacro.html > > BUILD FAILED > /var/gump/webmacro/build.xml:129: Warning: Could not find file > /var/gump/webmacro/webmacro.defaults.classic to copy. > > regards, > > Adam > -- > Experience Sybase Technology... > http://www.try.sybase.com > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email sponsored by: Enterprise Linux Forum Conference & > Expo > The Event For Linux Datacenter Solutions & Strategies in The Enterprise > Linux in the Boardroom; in the Front Office; & in the Server Room > http://www.enterpriselinuxforum.com > _______________________________________________ > Webmacro-devel mailing list > Web...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webmacro-devel |
|
From: Adam R. B. J. <aj...@tr...> - 2003-10-17 19:54:56
|
> Who registered us with Gump, any why? I guess I assumed that you guys did, but maybe it was somebody who depended on your code and wanted to be Gumped on your latest versions. http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/jakarta-gump/project/webmacro.xml Shows: Thu Mar 28 03:25:13 2002 UTC (18 months, 3 weeks ago) by jvanzyl regards, Adam |
|
From: Eric B. R. <eb...@tc...> - 2003-10-17 20:22:46
|
On Oct 17, 2003, at 3:52 PM, Adam R. B. Jack wrote: >> Who registered us with Gump, any why? > > I guess I assumed that you guys did, but maybe it was somebody who > depended > on your code and wanted to be Gumped on your latest versions. > > http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/jakarta-gump/project/webmacro.xml > > Shows: > > Thu Mar 28 03:25:13 2002 UTC (18 months, 3 weeks ago) by jvanzyl hmm. Jason was the one of the original authors of Velocity... ya know, the app that ripped us off. :) (no hard feelings, really). Personally, I don't want to receive email from Gump or Jakarta. They put us in Gump, they can submit patches if we don't build under their system. Anybody else? eric |
|
From: Adam R. B. J. <aj...@tr...> - 2003-10-19 05:52:45
|
> Personally, I don't want to receive email from Gump or Jakarta. They > put us in Gump, they can submit patches if we don't build under their > system. Anybody else? Hey, I walked into something I have no clue of. I'll happily remove you from Gump if it ruffles feathers. Sorry for the noise. regards Adam |
|
From: Eric B. R. <eb...@tc...> - 2003-10-17 21:39:40
|
On Oct 17, 2003, at 4:52 PM, Adam R. B. Jack wrote: >> Personally, I don't want to receive email from Gump or Jakarta. They >> put us in Gump, they can submit patches if we don't build under their >> system. Anybody else? > > Hey, I walked into something I have no clue of. I'll happily remove > you from > Gump if it ruffles feathers. Sorry for the noise. :) Being awake ruffles my feathers. But unless somebody else speaks up, yeah, I'd like to see us removed from Gump. And if you're able to do that, I'd greatly appreciate it. eric |
|
From: Adam R. B. J. <aj...@tr...> - 2003-10-17 23:29:39
|
> :) Being awake ruffles my feathers. I know that feeling. ;-) > But unless somebody else speaks up, yeah, I'd like to see us removed > from Gump. And if you're able to do that, I'd greatly appreciate it. As it stood, no project seems to be Gumping off it, so if you don't want it there it might as well be gone. So ... done. [If anybody wants it back, the configuration can be restored from CVS.] regards Adam |
|
From: Eric B. R. <eb...@tc...> - 2003-10-18 01:38:45
|
On Oct 17, 2003, at 7:24 PM, Adam R. B. Jack wrote: > As it stood, no project seems to be Gumping off it, so if you don't > want it > there it might as well be gone. > So ... done. Thanks Adam. I wanna apologize for my bad attitude and especially my comment of "I don't wanna receive mail from Jakarta". We do have friends in Jakarta land, including members of the Velocity project. eric |
|
From: <Web...@St...> - 2003-10-20 07:39:36
|
On Fri, 17 Oct 2003, Eric B.Ridge wrote: | On Oct 17, 2003, at 4:52 PM, Adam R. B. Jack wrote: | | >> Personally, I don't want to receive email from Gump or Jakarta. They | >> put us in Gump, they can submit patches if we don't build under their | >> system. Anybody else? | > | > Hey, I walked into something I have no clue of. I'll happily remove | > you from | > Gump if it ruffles feathers. Sorry for the noise. | | :) Being awake ruffles my feathers. | | But unless somebody else speaks up, yeah, I'd like to see us removed | from Gump. And if you're able to do that, I'd greatly appreciate it. Why would one want to be removed from Gump, really? To become less available? Endre. |
|
From: Brian G. <br...@qu...> - 2003-10-20 21:56:05
|
>On Oct 20, 2003, at 3:24 AM, Endre St=F8lsvik wrote: >>Why would one want to be removed from Gump, really? To become less >>available? > >Having another entity broadcast that we don't build under their system=20 >(maybe we don't build at all, haven't checked CVS in awhile) just doesn't= =20 >seem like a good idea. Esp. when that entity is our #1 competitor. I think this is kind of backwards reasoning. I think that being supported= =20 under Gump is a good thing which increases WM's reach. I don't buy the=20 "competitor" argument. I think the Gump folks were really trying to be=20 helpful and we were silly to tell them to go away. It makes us look like=20 an island, and no project can afford to be an island. -- Brian Goetz Quiotix Corporation br...@qu... Tel: 650-843-1300 Fax: 650-324-8032 http://www.quiotix.com |
|
From: Eric R. <eb...@tc...> - 2003-10-21 02:01:38
|
On Oct 20, 2003, at 3:25 PM, Brian Goetz wrote: >> On Oct 20, 2003, at 3:24 AM, Endre St=F8lsvik wrote: >>> Why would one want to be removed from Gump, really? To become less >>> available? >> >> Having another entity broadcast that we don't build under their=20 >> system (maybe we don't build at all, haven't checked CVS in awhile)=20= >> just doesn't seem like a good idea. Esp. when that entity is our #1=20= >> competitor. > > I think this is kind of backwards reasoning. I think that being=20 > supported under Gump is a good thing which increases WM's reach. I=20 > don't buy the "competitor" argument. I think the Gump folks were=20 > really trying to be helpful and we were silly to tell them to go away.=20= > It makes us look like an island, and no project can afford to be an=20= > island. I'm not wanting to make WM an island. But I do want to minimize noise=20= and additional responsibility. Especially that which comes from the=20 group that told us to "fuck off" a long time ago. Currently, I don't=20 even have the time to checkout WM from CVS and see if it can build from=20= the command-line, let alone the time to investigate why Gump (a project=20= I've never used, on a system I can't directly access or know anything=20 about) can't build it. Seriously, how many people on this list use Gump? If SourceForge had=20 some automated build system that the majority of SF projects were=20 using, sure, that'd be great. But Gump? Please. eric |
|
From: Brian G. <br...@qu...> - 2003-10-21 00:09:23
|
>I'm not wanting to make WM an island. But I do want to minimize noise and >additional responsibility. Especially that which comes from the group >that told us to "fuck off" a long time ago. Ancient history. >Seriously, how many people on this list use Gump? If SourceForge had some >automated build system that the majority of SF projects were using, sure, >that'd be great. But Gump? Please. Gump is gaining acceptance, because it fills a need -- the ability to say "this project depends on Xerces/WebMacro/pdfBox/whatever" and the build process does the right thing. Checking JARs for project X into the CVS of project Y is a pretty bad way to manage dependencies. Having project Y export "I need X" is better -- and Gump deals with that, by having a database of projects and their associated download info. I think Gump compatibility is worthwhile. I think a better response would have been "Thanks for the heads up, but we don't have time to figure out how to gumpify WM -- can you tell us what we need to do, or can we help you learn to build WM?" -- Brian Goetz Quiotix Corporation br...@qu... Tel: 650-843-1300 Fax: 650-324-8032 http://www.quiotix.com |
|
From: Eric R. <eb...@tc...> - 2003-10-20 15:02:08
|
On Oct 20, 2003, at 3:24 AM, Endre St=F8lsvik wrote: > Why would one want to be removed from Gump, really? To become less > available? Having another entity broadcast that we don't build under their system=20= (maybe we don't build at all, haven't checked CVS in awhile) just=20 doesn't seem like a good idea. Esp. when that entity is our #1=20 competitor. eric |
|
From: <Web...@St...> - 2003-10-21 01:03:31
|
On Mon, 20 Oct 2003, Eric Ridge wrote: | On Oct 20, 2003, at 3:24 AM, Endre St=F8lsvik wrote: | > Why would one want to be removed from Gump, really? To become less | > available? | | Having another entity broadcast that we don't build under their system | (maybe we don't build at all, haven't checked CVS in awhile) just | doesn't seem like a good idea. Esp. when that entity is our #1 | competitor. I thought that gump was a much larger entity than Jakarta. I thought that "gumping" was a way of fetching your dependencies.. Hmm E. |
×
Want the latest updates on software, tech news, and AI?
Get latest updates about software, tech news, and AI from SourceForge directly in your inbox once a month.
Thanks for helping keep SourceForge clean.
X