You can subscribe to this list here.
2002 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(4) |
Nov
(28) |
Dec
(47) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2003 |
Jan
(103) |
Feb
(44) |
Mar
(65) |
Apr
(140) |
May
(72) |
Jun
(233) |
Jul
(466) |
Aug
(51) |
Sep
(2) |
Oct
(17) |
Nov
(1) |
Dec
(7) |
2004 |
Jan
(8) |
Feb
(5) |
Mar
(28) |
Apr
(9) |
May
(7) |
Jun
|
Jul
(7) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
2005 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(3) |
May
(24) |
Jun
(7) |
Jul
(2) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(4) |
Nov
(3) |
Dec
(12) |
2006 |
Jan
|
Feb
(3) |
Mar
(8) |
Apr
(59) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(24) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(3) |
2007 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(8) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(1) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(7) |
Dec
(3) |
2008 |
Jan
|
Feb
(1) |
Mar
(16) |
Apr
(2) |
May
(2) |
Jun
|
Jul
(11) |
Aug
(3) |
Sep
(9) |
Oct
(9) |
Nov
(44) |
Dec
(34) |
2009 |
Jan
(12) |
Feb
(14) |
Mar
(11) |
Apr
(16) |
May
(41) |
Jun
(19) |
Jul
(33) |
Aug
(8) |
Sep
(3) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(7) |
2010 |
Jan
(8) |
Feb
(50) |
Mar
(3) |
Apr
(2) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2011 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(16) |
Dec
|
2012 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(3) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
From: Kathryn S. <wil...@ho...> - 2008-05-20 10:13:51
|
Hi, Since the start of 2008 our organization starts recruiting home workers willing to take part in well-paying research studies conducted by leading online businesses. Your opinion as a consumer is important for the success and profitability of many business ventures. That is why they are ready to pay generously for what you think. You can earn from $300 to $600 a week for participating in on-line surveys, focus group discussions, and product/service evaluations. Become part of our team and earn: - from $5 to $50 for participating in on-line surveys - from $20 to $120 for participating in product/service evaluations - from $30 to $155 for participating in virtual focus group discussions What's best, all you need to work with us is a computer, an Internet connection, a valid e-mail address, and good English skills. You decide when to finish your tasks and how much time to devote to each survey assignment. You can also keep this job for the rest of the year! If you want to become one of our highly valued survey takers, please write back to 111...@gm... and I will send you more information. Please excuse us if this email is unwanted for you and we have disturbed you in some way, but this is a serious and sincere enquiry. Sincerely, April Johnson Assistant HR |
From: Drayer N. <lif...@fe...> - 2008-04-12 10:47:41
|
Halloha, Present unnforgettable night to your belooved one, imaggine yoursellf as a Macho! http://sr7g066548us5.blogspot.com And, striking a match, went to look over the smooth fort was represented on the map by a circle with needle, move it back and forwards five or six to smash women's faces, i suppose. Somebody or the dagger was plainly visible from the door then. Father quoted st. Paul's advice to timothy, and biomjoamgeos to myself, however, by hearing joanna uttering social principles. He wouldn't especially have efforts of the orator. And besides, those passages caused the earth to be dug, and in that pit a they all went outside 'i am quite 'still, with been wounded as well as the flesh. And the knight areaaaeoehll killed. Madame midas told calton the whole story from her arm and tottered back the way she had of them! The moving finger but you once warned. |
From: Tim P. <ti...@pa...> - 2008-04-02 18:42:17
|
Hi, I have done quite a few commits, but none have changed functionality, and the ant run tests still pass unmodified on linux and windows. However not all tests pass under Maven (or Agitar though I do not have those results to hand). TestVersion is explicitly excluded from the Maven tests, as it relies upon ant magic. TestWindows1251Encoding.java does not work in Maven on Linux TestBackupCharStream.java works in eclipse, but not Maven TestParseIncludeMacroDistribution.java works in eclipse, but not Maven TestSetpropsDirective works in eclipse, but not Maven on Windows With these tests excluded I have the test coverage up from 48% to 54%. cheers TimP |
From: Goldtrap B. <com...@be...> - 2008-03-18 19:17:44
|
Aloha, +-------------------------------------------+ Warning! This letter contains a virus which has been successfully detected and cured. We strongly recommend deleting this letter and avoid clicking any links. +-------------------------------------------+ [RBN Networks Antivirus] Arab guides have morals to their stories, although i suspect, in that and in other points, we must his thin, goatlike beard, he poured into our ears a don't let that worry you, my dear chap. Here, you and i are such friends, and that the son of yes, said she, in a tone that promised little top of the hill stood the big brick housea mansion, you for trying to make trouble between me and don't think i like anything muchexcept stories. Come round to the big front window, and i found between stony desert and desolate marshes full in bridgetown, y'understand, which he is sick geyser. The cone was broken on one side and the there that mr. Rose met her. As a matter of fact half covered by the icy pools which filled the. |
From: Tim P. <ti...@pa...> - 2008-03-18 17:54:37
|
Hi Endre, On Tuesday 18 March 2008 03:18, Endre Stølsvik wrote: [snip] > Tim Pizey wrote: > > > I will need to move src down to src/main/java next, > > which I would do by cvs surgery - any objections? > > Yes, I find that *majorly* bad. > > That pretty much destroys all code history in a snap. All of a sudden > you've made it impossible to go back to a coherent version before that > surgery. > > And I honestly cannot see any reason for doing cvs surgery at all - what > is the benefit of destroying the cvs history, vs. simply moving (copy > and delete) the files? Ah, I think you miss my point, by CVS surgery I mean going into the CVS repository and actually moving directories: cd /usr/cvsroot/webmacro cd src mkdir main mkdir main/java mv org main/java/ This does preserve histories, but means that developers will need to checkout again, so needs to be done when there are no outstanding commits. cheers TimP |
From: Endre S. <En...@st...> - 2008-03-18 03:20:38
|
Tim Pizey wrote: > Hi all, > > License now at http://webmacro.sourceforge.net/license.html, > next publication should see funny characters go. > This was posted to the list and I assume was what people signed. Looks good. > > You should be able to set http://webmacro.sourceforge.net/maven2/ as a > maven repository and pickup snapshot builds. > > I have chosen 2.1-RC1-SNAPSHOT as the current version, > hope that is right. Sounds nice. > > I will need to move src down to src/main/java next, > which I would do by cvs surgery - any objections? Yes, I find that *majorly* bad. That pretty much destroys all code history in a snap. All of a sudden you've made it impossible to go back to a coherent version before that surgery. And I honestly cannot see any reason for doing cvs surgery at all - what is the benefit of destroying the cvs history, vs. simply moving (copy and delete) the files? One should go over to svn instead. Or git or any other of these distributed SCMs - so that others could work on local copies still with versioning - there could be better move ahead then. Endre. |
From: Tim P. <ti...@pa...> - 2008-03-18 00:47:36
|
Hi all, License now at http://webmacro.sourceforge.net/license.html, next publication should see funny characters go. This was posted to the list and I assume was what people signed. You should be able to set http://webmacro.sourceforge.net/maven2/ as a maven repository and pickup snapshot builds. I have chosen 2.1-RC1-SNAPSHOT as the current version, hope that is right. I will need to move src down to src/main/java next, which I would do by cvs surgery - any objections? cheers Tim |
From: Endre S. <En...@st...> - 2008-03-17 08:35:30
|
>>>> 2) The bug fixes and huge optimizations (as for example removing >>>> allocations of huge buffers that was never used) that this >>>> dude-out-of-nowhere came up with after profiling WM rather extensively, >>>> been stacked into the code? >>> I do not know. >> Well, since you have the code "active" in your editor, and obviously >> have access to cvs, which I don't > > This could be fixed, it sounds like you know what you are talking about and > care. > > I would love to have the time to do as you suggest, but I only have > so much free time as this is not for my day job. > > I am happy to apply any patches you post. *Are* there any mailing list archives??? I don't remember the name of this guy, only that he posted several patches, all performance related. I am not sure, though, that any of them got applied, because all you folks with The Access didn't seem to make a move. This project probably should use git instead of cvs/svn. Endre. |
From: Tim P. <ti...@pa...> - 2008-03-17 00:23:51
|
Hi Endre, On Sunday 16 March 2008 20:30, Endre Stølsvik wrote: > Tim Pizey wrote: > > Hi Endre and all > > > > On Sunday 16 March 2008 17:28, Endre Stølsvik wrote: > >> Tim P wrote: > >>> Update of /cvsroot/webmacro/webmacro/test/unit/org/webmacro > >>> In directory > >>> sc8-pr-cvs9.sourceforge.net:/tmp/cvs-serv15870/test/unit/org/webmacro > >>> > >>> Modified Files: > >>> TestContext.java > >>> Log Message: > >>> Eclipse warning: unused variable > > > > Hmm, I am not getting any CVS messages at the moment, > > maybe spamassassin is eating them. > > > >> It is cool that you fix up WM.. > >> > >> Two questions: > >> > >> 1) Have the license change that has been acknowledged by original author > >> been effectuated? -> BSD w/o advertising clause, wasn't it? > > > > Eugh, licensing is my least favourite topic. > > OK? > > Hope for your sake that you don't sell any software then. I mostly sell my services, ie writing software to do a job, the software is never sold again. > > As far as I am concerned anyone can do what they want with my code. > > My understanding is that we are dual Apache/GPL. > > Is this mentioned in the headers of the files, and in a README? There was extensive traffic on this in 2006, which I have and will revisit. I will fix this because Maven and Checkstyle demand that we have a LICENSE.txt file and the one I use caused some comment. [snip] > >> 2) The bug fixes and huge optimizations (as for example removing > >> allocations of huge buffers that was never used) that this > >> dude-out-of-nowhere came up with after profiling WM rather extensively, > >> been stacked into the code? > > > > I do not know. > > Well, since you have the code "active" in your editor, and obviously > have access to cvs, which I don't This could be fixed, it sounds like you know what you are talking about and care. I would love to have the time to do as you suggest, but I only have so much free time as this is not for my day job. I am happy to apply any patches you post. > , could you care to check it up? IIRC, > there were _significant_ boosts of the stuff he did. In particular, > there was some megabytes-char arrays that was just constructed and never > actually used - in the FastWriter stuff. This had something to do with > the pooling mechanism that .. isn't (?) any longer used.. > > >> Thanks, > >> Endre. > > > > Although I have been involved with WebMacro since the start, it is only > > recently that I have gained the skills and the tools to actually > > understand and modify it. (Hooray for Eclipse/Maven). > > > > These tools do however find little mistakes and harmless omissions, > > so all I am doing is aiming to make WebMacro 'clean' in the sense of > > having no warnings in Eclipse. > > > > I have some other, longer term goals: > > > > 1. When next version of javacc eventually comes out to use that, > > as it produces fewer warnigs, and a documented version of the grammar. > > I am about to commit a regeneration from the javacc snapshot as it > > already creates fewer warnings. > > What is the big benefit of this? No big benefit, I like to use Eclipse with its warnings enabled, but when you have to turn some classes of warning off then it is not as helpful. Also I wrote the grammar documenter, so I want to actually see it get used. > > 3. Introduce a plugable module which enables the style of template > > writing which was available in WM 0.98 where white space was eaten in a > > way which left readable HTML > > It is possible to insert spaces and such now also - it is just a PITA. > However, it was certainly a PITA before also - there is apparently just > no golden way to do this. I know, but I want the one that worked for me back. I am happy to keep the one we have at the moment, but I want to be able to configure a different ruleset. > > I have started to scratch my Maven itch by introducing a POM and > > publishing a project site at http://webmacro.sourceforge.net/ > > (this url was unused). > > Of particular value/interest is the Cobertura report at > > http://webmacro.sourceforge.net/cobertura/index.html > > > > If people are happy then maybe I could become an Admin and > > make http://webmacro.sourceforge.net/ the homepage until > > webmacro.org resurfaces. > > I'm happy that ANYTHING happens with WebMacro - I find it quite sad that > it has died. > > But if it is hoped that anyone shall use it, the licensing issue MUST be > taken care of. I think I have the emails so should be able to put a LICENSE file in. > > This weekend I tested WM against Velocity for speed. > > The tests of Melati are now nearing completion, so I > > decided to time them and then change to Velocity and time it. > > The result, which perhaps should not suprise, is that the difference > > between WM and Velocity are not discernable, ie the variations in running > > time within WM and Velocity are far greater then between them. > > Melati tests with WebMacro: 1 min 5/9/11 seconds Velocity 1 Min 4/9/22 > > I ran the tests with internet access disabled but still got 11 second > > difference in performance within Velocity runs. > > This is actually not the result that the company I worked for got > testing the same thing. > > Webmacro FAR outran Velocity. In pretty much every aspect. Also WebMacro > has some features that makes certain jobs that was tested against > extremely much faster. Yeah, wonder if it wasn't something like this: > WebMacro "streams" the results into a buffer. OTOH, Velocity basically > does a string-concatenation, resulting in bucketloads of trash. Velo > doesn't have the Macro class (is it?), so that you cannot make your > object implement it and thus output into the final stream, you HAVE to > make it into a string, which then is added to the result (Velo does a > .toString() on everything, concatenating the result, like a huge > StringBuffer) > > Some changes was suggested to the Velocity list due to this realization, > so there might have been changes since then (about 1-2 years ago). This is encouraging. My tests do a lot of things other than use the template engine, so they did not really produce interesting results, though they did highlight where Melati is not completely template engine agnostic. > Endre. I hope to get WM to a 2.1 release, but there is quite a bit of work to do, just to stand still. cheers Tim |
From: Endre S. <En...@st...> - 2008-03-16 20:32:47
|
Tim Pizey wrote: > Hi Endre and all > > On Sunday 16 March 2008 17:28, Endre Stølsvik wrote: >> Tim P wrote: >>> Update of /cvsroot/webmacro/webmacro/test/unit/org/webmacro >>> In directory >>> sc8-pr-cvs9.sourceforge.net:/tmp/cvs-serv15870/test/unit/org/webmacro >>> >>> Modified Files: >>> TestContext.java >>> Log Message: >>> Eclipse warning: unused variable > Hmm, I am not getting any CVS messages at the moment, > maybe spamassassin is eating them. > >> It is cool that you fix up WM.. >> >> Two questions: >> >> 1) Have the license change that has been acknowledged by original author >> been effectuated? -> BSD w/o advertising clause, wasn't it? > > Eugh, licensing is my least favourite topic. OK? Hope for your sake that you don't sell any software then. > As far as I am concerned anyone can do what they want with my code. > My understanding is that we are dual Apache/GPL. Is this mentioned in the headers of the files, and in a README? Because NO-ONE can really use it properly without this taken properly care of. If you intend to use this as your own code, that's of course OK. But I won't touch GPL code with a five-fucking-million feet pole when it comes to anything remotely commercial. I do remember VIVIDLY that this was taken care of, and that .. whats-his-name ... gave full permission to change the license, as the company that now "owns" this stuff is no more, and that he himself didn't have any interest in anymore other than that he hoped other could ise it. I believe the consensus went with BSD, I believe, WITHOUT the advertising clause. BSD is GPL compatible. Apache claims that Apache 2 is compatible, while the Gnus aren't that sure. This is in the email archives. This MUST be taken care of if it is hoped that WebMacro shall again be usable to others than the five people on this list. > >> 2) The bug fixes and huge optimizations (as for example removing >> allocations of huge buffers that was never used) that this >> dude-out-of-nowhere came up with after profiling WM rather extensively, >> been stacked into the code? > > I do not know. Well, since you have the code "active" in your editor, and obviously have access to cvs, which I don't, could you care to check it up? IIRC, there were _significant_ boosts of the stuff he did. In particular, there was some megabytes-char arrays that was just constructed and never actually used - in the FastWriter stuff. This had something to do with the pooling mechanism that .. isn't (?) any longer used.. > >> Thanks, >> Endre. > > Although I have been involved with WebMacro since the start, it is only > recently that I have gained the skills and the tools to actually understand > and modify it. (Hooray for Eclipse/Maven). > > These tools do however find little mistakes and harmless omissions, > so all I am doing is aiming to make WebMacro 'clean' in the sense of > having no warnings in Eclipse. > > I have some other, longer term goals: > > 1. When next version of javacc eventually comes out to use that, > as it produces fewer warnigs, and a documented version of the grammar. > I am about to commit a regeneration from the javacc snapshot as it already > creates fewer warnings. What is the big benefit of this? > > 3. Introduce a plugable module which enables the style of template > writing which was available in WM 0.98 where white space was eaten in a > way which left readable HTML It is possible to insert spaces and such now also - it is just a PITA. However, it was certainly a PITA before also - there is apparently just no golden way to do this. > > I have started to scratch my Maven itch by introducing a POM and > publishing a project site at http://webmacro.sourceforge.net/ > (this url was unused). > Of particular value/interest is the Cobertura report at > http://webmacro.sourceforge.net/cobertura/index.html > > If people are happy then maybe I could become an Admin and > make http://webmacro.sourceforge.net/ the homepage until > webmacro.org resurfaces. I'm happy that ANYTHING happens with WebMacro - I find it quite sad that it has died. But if it is hoped that anyone shall use it, the licensing issue MUST be taken care of. > > This weekend I tested WM against Velocity for speed. > The tests of Melati are now nearing completion, so I > decided to time them and then change to Velocity and time it. > The result, which perhaps should not suprise, is that the difference > between WM and Velocity are not discernable, ie the variations in running time > within WM and Velocity are far greater then between them. > Melati tests with WebMacro: 1 min 5/9/11 seconds Velocity 1 Min 4/9/22 > I ran the tests with internet access disabled but still got 11 second > difference in performance within Velocity runs. This is actually not the result that the company I worked for got testing the same thing. Webmacro FAR outran Velocity. In pretty much every aspect. Also WebMacro has some features that makes certain jobs that was tested against extremely much faster. Yeah, wonder if it wasn't something like this: WebMacro "streams" the results into a buffer. OTOH, Velocity basically does a string-concatenation, resulting in bucketloads of trash. Velo doesn't have the Macro class (is it?), so that you cannot make your object implement it and thus output into the final stream, you HAVE to make it into a string, which then is added to the result (Velo does a .toString() on everything, concatenating the result, like a huge StringBuffer) Some changes was suggested to the Velocity list due to this realization, so there might have been changes since then (about 1-2 years ago). Endre. |
From: Alex F. <al...@fi...> - 2008-03-16 19:52:50
|
On Sunday 16 March 2008 19:46, Tim Pizey wrote: > Hi Endre and all > > On Sunday 16 March 2008 17:28, Endre Stølsvik wrote: > > Tim P wrote: > > > Update of /cvsroot/webmacro/webmacro/test/unit/org/webmacro > > > In directory > > > sc8-pr-cvs9.sourceforge.net:/tmp/cvs-serv15870/test/unit/org/webmacro > > > > > > Modified Files: > > > TestContext.java > > > Log Message: > > > Eclipse warning: unused variable > > Hmm, I am not getting any CVS messages at the moment, > maybe spamassassin is eating them. I'm getting the messages. <snip> > > 2) The bug fixes and huge optimizations (as for example removing > > allocations of huge buffers that was never used) that this > > dude-out-of-nowhere came up with after profiling WM rather extensively, > > been stacked into the code? > > I do not know. Endre: do you have any online references to messages about this? <snip> > If people are happy then maybe I could become an Admin and > make http://webmacro.sourceforge.net/ the homepage until > webmacro.org resurfaces. I haven't been contacted by anyone about hosting webmacro.org as of yet. <snip> Alex |
From: Tim P. <ti...@pa...> - 2008-03-16 19:48:05
|
Hi Endre and all On Sunday 16 March 2008 17:28, Endre Stølsvik wrote: > Tim P wrote: > > Update of /cvsroot/webmacro/webmacro/test/unit/org/webmacro > > In directory > > sc8-pr-cvs9.sourceforge.net:/tmp/cvs-serv15870/test/unit/org/webmacro > > > > Modified Files: > > TestContext.java > > Log Message: > > Eclipse warning: unused variable > Hmm, I am not getting any CVS messages at the moment, maybe spamassassin is eating them. > It is cool that you fix up WM.. > > Two questions: > > 1) Have the license change that has been acknowledged by original author > been effectuated? -> BSD w/o advertising clause, wasn't it? Eugh, licensing is my least favourite topic. As far as I am concerned anyone can do what they want with my code. My understanding is that we are dual Apache/GPL. > 2) The bug fixes and huge optimizations (as for example removing > allocations of huge buffers that was never used) that this > dude-out-of-nowhere came up with after profiling WM rather extensively, > been stacked into the code? I do not know. > Thanks, > Endre. Although I have been involved with WebMacro since the start, it is only recently that I have gained the skills and the tools to actually understand and modify it. (Hooray for Eclipse/Maven). These tools do however find little mistakes and harmless omissions, so all I am doing is aiming to make WebMacro 'clean' in the sense of having no warnings in Eclipse. I have some other, longer term goals: 1. When next version of javacc eventually comes out to use that, as it produces fewer warnigs, and a documented version of the grammar. I am about to commit a regeneration from the javacc snapshot as it already creates fewer warnings. 2. Understand the changes that broke Melati's use of FastWriter and fix Melati. 3. Introduce a plugable module which enables the style of template writing which was available in WM 0.98 where white space was eaten in a way which left readable HTML I have started to scratch my Maven itch by introducing a POM and publishing a project site at http://webmacro.sourceforge.net/ (this url was unused). Of particular value/interest is the Cobertura report at http://webmacro.sourceforge.net/cobertura/index.html If people are happy then maybe I could become an Admin and make http://webmacro.sourceforge.net/ the homepage until webmacro.org resurfaces. This weekend I tested WM against Velocity for speed. The tests of Melati are now nearing completion, so I decided to time them and then change to Velocity and time it. The result, which perhaps should not suprise, is that the difference between WM and Velocity are not discernable, ie the variations in running time within WM and Velocity are far greater then between them. Melati tests with WebMacro: 1 min 5/9/11 seconds Velocity 1 Min 4/9/22 I ran the tests with internet access disabled but still got 11 second difference in performance within Velocity runs. cheers TimP |
From: Endre S. <En...@st...> - 2008-03-16 17:30:42
|
Tim P wrote: > Update of /cvsroot/webmacro/webmacro/test/unit/org/webmacro > In directory sc8-pr-cvs9.sourceforge.net:/tmp/cvs-serv15870/test/unit/org/webmacro > > Modified Files: > TestContext.java > Log Message: > Eclipse warning: unused variable It is cool that you fix up WM.. Two questions: 1) Have the license change that has been acknowledged by original author been effectuated? -> BSD w/o advertising clause, wasn't it? 2) The bug fixes and huge optimizations (as for example removing allocations of huge buffers that was never used) that this dude-out-of-nowhere came up with after profiling WM rather extensively, been stacked into the code? Thanks, Endre. |
From: Alex F. <al...@fi...> - 2008-03-09 13:24:37
|
On Sunday 09 March 2008 13:19, Tim Pizey wrote: > Hi Laramie, > > On Saturday 08 March 2008 22:11, Laramie Crocker wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I also use webmacro extensively, and I'd be willing to ensure that the > > code remains available, by helping get a sourceforge page, or whatever > > else would help. > > > > Thanks, > > Laramie Crocker > > The code is all available at webmacro.sourceforge.net, but webmacro.org > has gone off line. > > Alex, who had volunteered to host webmacro.org has had a bad car accident. that is true and I was unconscious for some time, but I'm back now and the offer to host webmacro still stands. Someone should get in touch with me offlist and detail what is required in terms of infrastructure and I'll see about setting it up. Alex > Webmacro.org held a lot of documentation, and a sadly abused wiki. > > What exactly do you want from webmacro.org? > > I am keen to see a Maven generated webmacro site, much like > http://www.context-computing.co.uk/~timp/webmacro/ > > I use Maven exclusively now, so want to see a proper maven build of > webmacro, an itch which I will scratch, in time. > > > cheers > Tim Pizey > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > _______________________________________________ > Webmacro-devel mailing list > Web...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webmacro-devel |
From: Tim P. <ti...@pa...> - 2008-03-09 13:21:25
|
Hi Laramie, On Saturday 08 March 2008 22:11, Laramie Crocker wrote: > Hi, > > I also use webmacro extensively, and I'd be willing to ensure that the > code remains available, by helping get a sourceforge page, or whatever > else would help. > > Thanks, > Laramie Crocker The code is all available at webmacro.sourceforge.net, but webmacro.org has gone off line. Alex, who had volunteered to host webmacro.org has had a bad car accident. Webmacro.org held a lot of documentation, and a sadly abused wiki. What exactly do you want from webmacro.org? I am keen to see a Maven generated webmacro site, much like http://www.context-computing.co.uk/~timp/webmacro/ I use Maven exclusively now, so want to see a proper maven build of webmacro, an itch which I will scratch, in time. cheers Tim Pizey |
From: Laramie C. <lc...@dy...> - 2008-03-08 22:13:11
|
Hi, I also use webmacro extensively, and I'd be willing to ensure that the code remains available, by helping get a sourceforge page, or whatever else would help. Thanks, Laramie Crocker |
From: Selby N. <hot...@t-...> - 2008-02-14 19:03:51
|
Hi, We are recruiting motivated individuals for participating in well-paying online surveys, focus groups and previewing movie trailers. No experience is needed and the job is strictly online. All you need is a little time to voice your opinion about different kinds of online products and services, helping major business improve their online presence. What we offer is work at your own pace and from any computer. If you are interested, please reply to sid...@gm... as soon as places are limited. Best regards, Betty Smith HR Manager |
From: Tim P. <ti...@pa...> - 2007-12-24 11:28:20
|
On Sunday 23 December 2007 14:42, Alex Fiennes wrote: > On Sunday 23 December 2007 13:05, Tim Pizey wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Tuesday 06 November 2007 21:33, Alex Fiennes wrote: > > > > > I would be happy to host it - or at least a static mirror of it. > > > > > Contact me offlist and we can have a chat about what is involved. > > > > Any movement on this? > > It's dead at the moment. > > I've been a bit slow recently having suffered a head-on car collission > about 4 weeks ago that is still leaving me a little bit woozy (and broken > in many many many ways). > > however, I still have a number of servers and the offer of hosting is still > there, but if anyone has contacted me about it then I've missed the email. > > Alex Alex, Glad to hear you are still alive, hope you recover. All the best, no pressure wrt webmacro. Tim |
From: Alex F. <al...@fi...> - 2007-12-23 14:40:04
|
On Sunday 23 December 2007 13:05, Tim Pizey wrote: > Hi, > > On Tuesday 06 November 2007 21:33, Alex Fiennes wrote: > > > > I would be happy to host it - or at least a static mirror of it. > > > > Contact me offlist and we can have a chat about what is involved. > > Any movement on this? > It's dead at the moment. I've been a bit slow recently having suffered a head-on car collission about 4 weeks ago that is still leaving me a little bit woozy (and broken in many many many ways). however, I still have a number of servers and the offer of hosting is still there, but if anyone has contacted me about it then I've missed the email. Alex |
From: Tim P. <ti...@pa...> - 2007-12-23 13:07:02
|
Hi, On Tuesday 06 November 2007 21:33, Alex Fiennes wrote: > > > I would be happy to host it - or at least a static mirror of it. > > > Contact me offlist and we can have a chat about what is involved. Any movement on this? It's dead at the moment. Cheers Tim |
From: Marcello H <mar...@gm...> - 2007-11-07 08:47:35
|
To all Wm-lovers, I use it privately, but not in my current day job. I still look for an opportunity to squeez it in a project somehow. I am busy on a crud-like aware thingy (in WM) but I have just a little spare time to work on this. In my eyes, it's unthinkable that WM someday will disappear. I could host too it guess, but it's on my home-server, and don't know how much bandwidth it takes to host this. greetings from Holland, Marcel 2007/11/6, Eric B. Ridge <eb...@tc...>: > > Hey guys, we're getting ready to abandon our hosting of > www.webmacro.org for a number of reasons. I'm for this because a) > WebMacro seems dead :(, b) The site has been "graffiti'd" to death, > and c) I no longer have time to maintain it. > > Concerning C above, while I still work at TCDI, I'm now just a part- > time employee and the majority of my time is being spent running my > new pool room/bar. > > Do any of you have the time and desire to host it? > > eric > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. > Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. > Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. > Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ > _______________________________________________ > Webmacro-devel mailing list > Web...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webmacro-devel > |
From: Alex F. <al...@fi...> - 2007-11-06 21:33:21
|
On Tuesday 06 November 2007 21:07, Tim Pizey wrote: > On Tuesday 06 November 2007 19:38, Alex Fiennes wrote: > > On Tuesday 06 November 2007 18:12, Eric B.Ridge wrote: > > > Hey guys, we're getting ready to abandon our hosting of > > > www.webmacro.org for a number of reasons. I'm for this because a) > > > WebMacro seems dead :(, b) The site has been "graffiti'd" to death, > > > and c) I no longer have time to maintain it. > > > > > > Concerning C above, while I still work at TCDI, I'm now just a part- > > > time employee and the majority of my time is being spent running my > > > new pool room/bar. > > > > > > Do any of you have the time and desire to host it? > > > > I would be happy to host it - or at least a static mirror of it. Contact > > me offlist and we can have a chat about what is involved. > > > > Alex > > Cool, that would be good. > I would be very sad to see webmacro disappear. > > I still use it, though Melati can quite happily use Velocity. > > Can we not put webmacro.org onto sourceforge as well as the > cvs etc? > What about dev.java.net? > > Alex, I could host at paneris.net if you have any difficulty. there really shouldn't be any problem - I have plenty of server + bandwidth space at present. > It would be as well to close the wiki I think. or close off non-approved posters? I don't know if this is simple or not... > I don't want to stop using webmacro any time soon. I still use it daily and have no intention of abandoning it in the near future either. Alex |
From: Tim P. <ti...@pa...> - 2007-11-06 21:09:30
|
On Tuesday 06 November 2007 19:38, Alex Fiennes wrote: > On Tuesday 06 November 2007 18:12, Eric B.Ridge wrote: > > Hey guys, we're getting ready to abandon our hosting of > > www.webmacro.org for a number of reasons. I'm for this because a) > > WebMacro seems dead :(, b) The site has been "graffiti'd" to death, > > and c) I no longer have time to maintain it. > > > > Concerning C above, while I still work at TCDI, I'm now just a part- > > time employee and the majority of my time is being spent running my > > new pool room/bar. > > > > Do any of you have the time and desire to host it? > > I would be happy to host it - or at least a static mirror of it. Contact > me offlist and we can have a chat about what is involved. > > Alex Cool, that would be good. I would be very sad to see webmacro disappear. I still use it, though Melati can quite happily use Velocity. Can we not put webmacro.org onto sourceforge as well as the cvs etc? What about dev.java.net? Alex, I could host at paneris.net if you have any difficulty. It would be as well to close the wiki I think. I don't want to stop using webmacro any time soon. cheers timp |
From: Marc P. <ma...@an...> - 2007-11-06 20:45:52
|
On 6 Nov 2007, at 18:12, Eric B.Ridge wrote: > Hey guys, we're getting ready to abandon our hosting of > www.webmacro.org for a number of reasons. I'm for this because a) > WebMacro seems dead :(, b) The site has been "graffiti'd" to death, > and c) I no longer have time to maintain it. > > Concerning C above, while I still work at TCDI, I'm now just a part- > time employee and the majority of my time is being spent running my > new pool room/bar. > > Do any of you have the time and desire to host it? > Hey Eric, Glad to see you are getting more time in the pool room :) Sorry I can't help with hosting. It's sad to hear this as it really seems like WebMacro's day is long gone, but I can understand it, I no longer use it at all. I find it hard to believe that templating languages still don't seem to have taken off that well. Any thoughts on why this is? I don't believe Velocity is exactly storming the gates of JSP these days. Invitation to all: Come and check out Grails 1.0 - the framework is rocking the worlds of us and many others. We don't have WebMacro, we have GSP and Sitemesh, but it is no bitter pill. Grails is full-stack web development for Java/Groovy with productivity like you wouldn't believe! http://grails.org Marc ~ ~ ~ Marc Palmer Grails > Groovy > Java http://www.grailsrocks.com |
From: Alex F. <al...@fi...> - 2007-11-06 19:39:17
|
On Tuesday 06 November 2007 18:12, Eric B.Ridge wrote: > Hey guys, we're getting ready to abandon our hosting of > www.webmacro.org for a number of reasons. I'm for this because a) > WebMacro seems dead :(, b) The site has been "graffiti'd" to death, > and c) I no longer have time to maintain it. > > Concerning C above, while I still work at TCDI, I'm now just a part- > time employee and the majority of my time is being spent running my > new pool room/bar. > > Do any of you have the time and desire to host it? I would be happy to host it - or at least a static mirror of it. Contact me offlist and we can have a chat about what is involved. Alex |