From: <Web...@St...> - 2006-04-03 10:40:01
|
On Mon, 3 Apr 2006, Sven Schliesing wrote: | So we see no vehement protest against using log4j, right? .. But maybe through commons logging? (or SLF4J) I personally use log4j for our server, so log4j would in theory suit me totally nice, but considering that there are both log4j and the now rather prevalent jsr 47 (java.util.logging) and some other fringe stuff, it seems slightly backwards to go with one specific system. Regards, Endre |