From: <Web...@St...> - 2005-07-06 10:17:21
|
On Tue, 5 Jul 2005, Lane Sharman wrote: | Hi Endre, |=20 | Someone suggested a while back that the official release be 2.1 because= 2.0b | had hung around so long. The suggestion, by Marc, was that a quickish 2.1 could follow the 2.0 wit= h=20 the Spring and JSP stuff included. The body of that mail follows: ------------------------------ Endre St=F8lsvik wrote: > /me still eagerly awaiting 2.0 Nope... but it's blocking on me getting the Spring and JSP stuff into it,= =20 which hasn't been possible because of work pressures. I'm on away for a=20 week now, but when I'm back I will endeavour to get this stuff in ASAP. You could always put out 2.0 RC2 / full release with the minor new Broker= =20 changes that I committed and the JDK 1.5 compatibility, and we could roll= =20 a 2.1 with the Spring and JSP stuff in. Cheers --- Marc Palmer wj...@wa... ------------------------------ I find it -really really bad- if the -next- release is called 2.1. There=20 have never been a release of The New Major Version 2.0, and then one=20 suddenly releases a MINOR version of that MAJOR version, called 2.1. The next release should be called 2.0, and it should preferrably come out= =20 yesteryear. Endre. |