From: Marc P. <ma...@an...> - 2005-05-05 14:40:27
|
Keats Kirsch wrote: > Obviously the WM project is not particularly healthy at this point. The > core developers appear to be focused on other projects and no one has > picked up the mantle. On the other hand, WM appears to be remarkably > stable and still quite useful. The 2.0 enhancements also appear to be > solid, so it definitely makes sense to have a release candidate. Since > Eric isn't able to find the time right now, I may try to do this > sometime soon. > > We welcome anyone who shares the WM vision to step forward and help > revive this project. Otherwise 2.0 will probably be the final release. Is there another solution? Do we have a corporate sponsor anywhere? i.e. say USD $1000 per month would be plenty to have someone keep WM ticking over, project manage it and handle releases and so on? It's not a lot of money for a great product, which could become greater with some work on it. As I see it the fact that WM is not in the Jakarta fold means that there is little "community" building around it, and that is why it is suffering. Oh, and the fact that it is rock solid. Cheers -- Marc Palmer wj...@wa... Wangjammers - Java, J2ME and Web Consultants ~ http://www.wangjammers.org/ |