Re: o.wm.Template broken? (was: Re: [Webmacro-devel] One case for "ditching" FastWriter)

[Eric R. <eb...@tc...>]

On Dec 9, 2003, at 12:40 PM, Lane Sharman wrote:

> Is there a cvs record of the change to o.w.Template?

Of course there is.  But it doesn't explain this particular change.

eric

>
> -lane
>
> Eric Ridge wrote:
>
>> On Jul 5, 2003, at 7:26 PM, Brian Goetz wrote:
>>
>>> What my plan is is to pass in an OutputStream and encoding to
>>> template.write, and hide the FW implementation so it is internal 
>>> only.
>>> This is very easy and retains all the benefits of using FW.
>>
>>
>> I realize I'm finally getting around to responding to a message that 
>> is 5 months old, but....
>>
>> Why does org.webmacro.Template no longer "extend Macro"?
>>
>> Doesn't this prohibit one from simply referencing a template object 
>> that is in the context and have it expand correctly?  For example:
>>
>> {
>>     context.put("MyTemplate", new StringTemplate("$foo"));
>> }
>>
>> #set $foo = "FOO!"
>> $MyTemplate
>>
>> isn't this broken now?
>>
>> eric
>>
>>
>>
>> -------------------------------------------------------
>> This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
>> Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills.  Sign up for 
>> IBM's
>> Free Linux Tutorials.  Learn everything from the bash shell to sys 
>> admin.
>> Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click
>> _______________________________________________
>> Webmacro-devel mailing list
>> Web...@li...
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webmacro-devel
>>
>
> -- 
> Lane Sharman
> Just Do IT, Better.
> 858-755-2868
>
>
>